Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?

["J. Roeleveld" <joost@antarean.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]


On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 04:20:16 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote:
> > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote:
> > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months,
> > >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium.
> > >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days
> > >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though
> > >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas)
> > > 
> > > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq
> > > in KDE-based distros.  Can somebody comment on how rekonq is 
doing?
> > 
> > I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently
> > after it refused to accept every URL as malformed.
> > Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ;
> > I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox.
> > My window manager is Fluxbox.
> 
> I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
> occasionally as an Internet browser.  However, I have set it up to use
> WebKit as its browser engine instead of KHTML.

Why not use Dolphin as file manager?

--
Joost

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5661 bytes --]