From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B479613877A for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60773E0BA0; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.165]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EA1E0B89 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.137] (helo=smtp6.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9X4t-00047a-BB for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:13:47 +0200 Received: from 53579160.cm-6-8c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.145.96] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp6.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9X4t-0001FU-3N for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:13:47 +0200 Received: from andromeda.localnet (unknown [62.41.73.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C27E74C for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:13:37 +0200 (CEST) From: "J. Roeleveld" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:13:36 +0200 Message-ID: <1419565.3RCxVFKX0b@andromeda> Organization: Antarean User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (Linux/3.12.21-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <53CE2967.1010105@iinet.net.au> References: <53CE2967.1010105@iinet.net.au> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Ziggo-spambar: ---- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.9 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3,RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-Archives-Salt: 54d2d912-dc79-4363-9b2e-0b015169c221 X-Archives-Hash: 249fd00609548fcf602045773db76252 On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: > I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update > because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest > rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to > override the portage checksums and say install anyway? Because this > package always fails anyway, I cant see any security gain by having a > manual update every-time anyway. I would be more interested in finding out why it fails? I use adobe flash myself and never experience a checksum issue with it. -- Joost