RE: [gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader

[<burlingk@cv63.navy.mil>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 883 bytes --]




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:iaindb@netspace.net.au]
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:26 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader
>
> I'm happy to leave the info vs man flamewar for someone else,
> but what I _don't_ like is when you have both man and info,
> and one of them is very deficient (in grub's case, man).  The
> description is different, less informative, and quite
> misleading.  Instead, is should say either nothing but "refer
> to info pages"; or it should be the same as the info pages...
>
> would anyone agree?

That is exactly what a number of packages do I think.
I have seen many of them that the man page and the
info page were identicle.  More often though it looked
like they made a decent man page, and coppied it to info.

:-)

éí¢‹¬z¸\x1ežÚ(¢¸&j)bž	b²