From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IB089-0001k3-8g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:23:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6I3Lpp6005751; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:21:51 GMT Received: from dnsmail2.fleet.navy.mil (pacfb.fleet.navy.mil [205.56.145.36]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6I3HR8J000969 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:17:28 GMT Received: from VSCAN3 ([157.153.3.104]) by dnsmail2.fleet.navy.mil (8.12.11.SSC-RH.1/8.12.9) with SMTP id l6I3Gt5i008001 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:17:26 GMT Received: from cv63ucsex1.cv63.navy.mil ([157.153.3.104]) by VSCAN3 (SMSSMTP 4.1.11.41) with SMTP id M2007071803172220732 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:17:25 GMT content-class: urn:content-classes:message Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:18:41 +0900 Message-ID: <14178ED3A898524FB036966D696494FB138F20@messenger.cv63.navy.mil> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? Thread-Index: AcfIonGKNw+aaXTJSrC3iPViTDNAbwATvxtA From: To: X-Archives-Salt: 28464072-d81c-47d3-a390-ac427e637613 X-Archives-Hash: 346af7beb441ea6ac5a53ca393be71c4 > -----Original Message----- > From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:bss03@volumehost.net]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:27 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? >=20 >=20 > More than that -- they don't allow the "compromised" devices=20 > to boot. Of course, that's *required* to lay down the=20 > restrictions they want, since one the device is booted from=20 > freely modified code, there's no method of remote attestation > to guarantee your aren't just pretending to be a "genuine" device. >=20 I may need to read more. Not allowing it to boot is a bit extreme. I will read more on the subject before I say anything else about the TiVo guys. ^^;; -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list