public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Skwar <listen@alexander.skwar.name>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user]  Re: Re: /etc/conf.d/net
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:11:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400633.W7VoHeIyjZ@m-id.message-center.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1156167798.26520.73.camel@gentoo

· Alan Mckinnon <alan@linuxholdings.co.za>:

> On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 10:05 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> · Alan Mckinnon <alan@linuxholdings.co.za>:
> 
>> > Docs on /etc/conf.d/net are about as clear as mud from where I sit. The
>> > last thing I need to figure out is what exactly is the difference
>> > between config_eth0 and iface_eth0 entries?
>> 
>> Oh, that's simple! config_eth0 exists and iface_* doesn't. Quite
>> clear, as far as I'm concerned.
> 
> Hmmm, it's now as clear as mud smeared all over a 100 foot black
> obsidian monolith. If iface_* doesn't exist, then why does it work on my
> machine?

Maybe backwards compatability? Maybe it's simply ignored and the
system is working on pure defaults which fit to your system?

>> > I once found a note in some other obscure doc that iface_eth0 seems to
>> > be the syntax for ifconfig, while config_eth0 seems to be for iproute2.
>> > Can anyone confirm or deny this?
>>
>> Check out the documentation in /etc/conf.d/net.example. It'll deny
>> that iface_* is for one tool and config_* for the other tool.
> 
> I read it, but it doesn't deny anything -

True. Just like it doesn't deny the (hypothetical) existance of a
"alexander_skwar_is_an_idiot" configuration setting.

> it simply doesn't mention 
> iface_* at all.

Which means, that it doesn't exist, IMO. It makes no sense to mention
what does NOT exist, as this list would be endless. It only makes sense
to mention what exists, and this *should* be a complete list.

> Maybe iface_* is deprecated, but I've used it since 
> 2005.0 and that's what the docs said then.

Fine. And now we've got 2006.

> I haven't seen any updates 
> about it either. The baselayout ebuild has several checks at the end for
> old deprecated files and veriables, but iface_* isn't one of them.

File a bug about net.example not mentioning iface_* or about the baselayout
ebuild not checking for the deprecated variable.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Es ist ein Unglück, nicht genug Geist zu haben, um eine Rede zu halten
und nicht genug Selbsterkenntnis, um zu schweigen.
                -- Jean de la Bruyère


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



      reply	other threads:[~2006-08-21 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-19 14:20 [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net David Corbin
2006-08-19 17:09 ` Pablo Antonio
2006-08-19 23:59   ` David Corbin
2006-08-20  5:52 ` Philip Webb
2006-08-21  7:47   ` Alan Mckinnon
2006-08-21  8:05     ` [gentoo-user] /etc/conf.d/net Alexander Skwar
2006-08-21 13:43       ` Alan Mckinnon
2006-08-21 21:11         ` Alexander Skwar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1400633.W7VoHeIyjZ@m-id.message-center.info \
    --to=listen@alexander.skwar.name \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox