From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD0D1381F3 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 10:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F641E09F6; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 10:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-out-1.rwth-aachen.de (mx-out-1.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.5.186]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0E5E09E5 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 10:09:58 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1043,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="240387918" Received: from relay-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (HELO relay.rwth-aachen.de) ([134.130.7.75]) by mx-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de with ESMTP; 06 Oct 2013 12:09:58 +0200 Received: from numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de (numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.161.252]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.14.4+Sun/8.13.8/1) with ESMTP id r96A9vJR006836 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 12:09:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from numa-i (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4CC2C1F for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 12:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 12:09:59 +0200 From: Helmut Jarausch Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple package instances within a single package slot To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <524E9D8B.4020301@wonkology.org> <524EABD5.4070200@fastmail.co.uk> <20131004174052.72b19be1@weird.wonkology.org> <524F1958.3030303@gmail.com> <20131005175952.0a4a3fd7@weird.wonkology.org> <20131005190218.3a3db9af@digimed.co.uk> <20131005203036.2e883e8a@weird.wonkology.org> In-Reply-To: <20131005203036.2e883e8a@weird.wonkology.org> (from wonko@wonkology.org on Sat Oct 5 20:30:36 2013) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.5.1-75-g9ac8512 Message-Id: <1381054199.5030.0@numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 3fff779a-2b8c-45a1-bf91-aa2794266465 X-Archives-Hash: cbdb7e9e0cd611f7ad789912b398e1c3 On 10/05/2013 08:30:36 PM, Alex Schuster wrote: > Neil Bothwick writes: >=20 > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 17:59:52 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote: > > > > > No, there is something wrong here. When I updated portage, it also > > > remerged libreoffice. Upgrading claws-mail updated > > > dev-libs/libdbusmenu and dev-libs/libindicate, and wanted to =20 > remerge > > > libreoffice, which I avoided. > > > Next, I updated chromium, which also remerged libreoffice. Again. > > > > > > And whatever package I try to update, emerge wants to remerge > > > libreoffice. Happens with all the packages I tried, which are > > > adobe-flash, python, zsh, xterm. > > > > If portage believes LO needs to be rebuilt, it will try to do so > > whichever packages you are emerging, just let it happen. >=20 > I already did that, twice, when updating portage and chromium. emerge > still wants to remerge libreoffice whenever I upgrade a package. >=20 > > With a suitable > > --jobs setting, portage will emerge all the other packages before =20 > LO is > > done. >=20 > No, at least with portage, the installation happened after =20 > libreoffice was > installed. >=20 > weird ~ # emerge -1uaj portage >=20 > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: >=20 > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild r U ] app-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.2-r1 [4.1.2.2] > [ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.2.7 [2.2.0_alpha188] > [...] > >>> Emerging (1 of 2) app-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.2-r1 > >>> Emerging (2 of 2) sys-apps/portage-2.2.7 > >>> Installing (1 of 2) app-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.2-r1 > >>> Installing (2 of 2) sys-apps/portage-2.2.7 > >>> Jobs: 2 of 2 complete Load avg: 3.06, 2.76, 2.63 >=20 You are not alone, Alex, please see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D486438 Helmut=