From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-149036-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FD41381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:28:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4777CE09A5;
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pb0-f50.google.com (mail-pb0-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3010CE08C2
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:28:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id uo5so1041495pbc.23
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:content-type
:x-mailer:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=MXcEOW2a0qIPuhsTKPT4886paLTIQa1CAsB92drGaGk=;
b=y2fFrMworuqIZsKJE02ucse4G0bYomGvEIXoAax6hOvXs+uqP6qeKgBsAVrufoAYN/
TQe10U183waZn9WVij/ohUu3/6Z8wUO6f90ZYp6R9fipKdCcT3fddsnBj7WpRkPK2bFs
4svxq2DxguDWF/hLy388MzzmtpgbmrXlGxTeMNzRIbJ0V508tCQhEN+mWF26rb0en0+w
W54o50/CMrDqxBqg7fjN16ySmNQg2dNf+vAXfT5oOrwfGUDg3hdJTpkEE1KNNB4AeF0v
SzzUFMO7ztNoPDz0Tkz6OOIWq3oPBCK55uH2T6Mu7LHTfNeE9SuNXrTRjPayc8AyNz6a
QM5w==
X-Received: by 10.66.146.42 with SMTP id sz10mr66869243pab.78.1375086504014;
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.165] (c-24-6-133-82.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.133.82])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id py4sm75621545pbc.14.2013.07.29.01.28.21
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1375086499.28356.2.camel@siegeengine>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] Some possibly (?) helpful hints re
the big gnome-3.8 update
From: Mark Pariente <markpariente@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:28:19 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CADPrc829_MrBAUSt9whTkOX61+ZjZm4OvBkeM9pFJXBH95bBng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <kt1eum$rf4$1@ger.gmane.org>
<CADPrc80uEeo=e6nvak1KXfcbsH9D_TOW7M-+R98T4B6B7Y=6Og@mail.gmail.com>
<51F45029.8030903@gmail.com>
<CADPrc80NWYvGEQGey9CTzZZ-T_iRhgnEx2M7Fa8-yUc6M1wdbA@mail.gmail.com>
<51F4D14A.4000309@xunil.at> <51F51B66.7040004@hadt.biz>
<CADPrc829_MrBAUSt9whTkOX61+ZjZm4OvBkeM9pFJXBH95bBng@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 94083773-a056-4fda-8769-de8a3866d98a
X-Archives-Hash: d8025b912b426b22bcfaee922d4b6102
On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 11:16 -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Michael Hampicke <mh@hadt.biz> wrote:
> > Am 28.07.2013 10:07, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> >> Am 28.07.2013 10:04, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> >>
> >>> The only "special" thing I'm doing is to mask >sys-apps/systemd-204,
> >>> since 205 introduced the new cgroups management code (with systemd as
> >>> the only writer of the cgroups hierarchy), and it seems to cause some
> >>> minor problems with logind. Other than that, it works withouth a
> >>> glitch: gnome-base/gnome-3.8.0, sys-apps/systemd-204, no consolekit at
> >>> all.
> >>
> >> Same here, yes. I run systemd-206 but I didn't notice an problem(s) yet.
> >> Maybe there are some and I don't get it ;-)
> >>
> >
> > I had one problem, but I am not sure, if it's related to systemd > 204,
> > the removal of consolekit, or gnome at all.
> >
> > But when logging into my gnome session, /usr/libexec/gvfsd-fuse can not
> > be started, because the permissions of /dev/fuse are rw------ root:root
> >
> > Other distros like ubuntu have a fuse group for that, which does not
> > exist on gentoo. So I assume the default permissions for /dev/fuse on
> > gentoo machines should be rw-rw-rw- root:root?
>
> My problem was that *sometimes* (not always) I was unable to unlock my
> session after suspending my laptop or desktop. Reverting back to
> systemd-204 solved it, so I'm assuming that's the problem, although I
> didn't really investigated the issue.
This turned out to be an upstream issue. See:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67267
and the corresponding Gentoo bug:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477954
Upstream has already fixed it on git, so we'll either have to wait until
systemd-207 or see if the systemd maintainers cherry pick the patch as
206-r1 on portage.
--Mark