From: "Randy Barlow" <randy@electronsweatshop.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] which -march flag to pick for Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf?
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 03:22:49 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359.24.74.96.11.1180077769.squirrel@electronsweatshop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9a0a6da0705240938y4bc79b28u28f85c037095e9a7@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 24, 2007 12:38 pm, Denis wrote:
> My aim is to build a fast, stable system for my
> computations, which ultimately brought me to another major decision:
> 32-bit or 64-bit... I run simulations which I write in C and
> numerical computations which I run in Mathematica (which has just
> released the 64-bit version). Would a 64-bit system significantly
> benefit these applications?
If you are using a lot of memory in your computations, then the 64-bit
environment will be much friendlier to you :) Also, if I understand
correctly, you will get higher precision on floating point calculations
(someone correct me if I am wrong here!) I also believe that the 64 bit
processors are able to perform more instructions per second on average
when executing 64 bit code vs. 32 bit code if I am not mistaken...
--
Randy Barlow
http://www.electronsweatshop.com
"Oh me of little faith..."
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-25 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-24 13:55 [gentoo-user] which -march flag to pick for Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf? Denis
2007-05-24 14:15 ` Ryan Sims
2007-05-24 14:17 ` Mark Shields
2007-05-24 15:13 ` Denis
2007-05-24 15:43 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-05-24 15:55 ` Graham Murray
2007-05-24 16:38 ` Denis
2007-05-25 7:22 ` Randy Barlow [this message]
2007-05-24 15:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-25 9:10 [gentoo-user] " burlingk
2007-05-25 17:03 ` Andreas Claesson
2007-05-25 18:26 ` Denis
2007-05-28 3:05 ` Randy Barlow
2007-05-31 1:11 ` Dan Farrell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359.24.74.96.11.1180077769.squirrel@electronsweatshop.com \
--to=randy@electronsweatshop.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox