From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-142274-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E130138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  2 Nov 2012 08:44:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22BA821C02F;
	Fri,  2 Nov 2012 08:44:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mta-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (mta-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.7.72])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D4821C001
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  2 Nov 2012 08:42:25 +0000 (UTC)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed
Received: from mx-out-1.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.186])
 by mta-1.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de
 (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008))
 with ESMTP id <0MCU00B9QQUOA5C0@mta-1.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:42:24 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,697,1344204000";   d="scan'208";a="197983134"
Received: from relay-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (HELO relay.rwth-aachen.de)
 ([134.130.7.75]) by mx-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de with ESMTP; Fri,
 02 Nov 2012 09:42:25 +0100
Received: from numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de
 (numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.161.252])
	by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.14.4+Sun/8.13.8/1) with ESMTP id qA28gOCh018116	for
 <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:42:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from numa-i (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F6A214C	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,
 02 Nov 2012 09:42:25 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:42:25 +0100
From: Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] qfile alternative?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <1351782954.15954.0@numa-i> <m3hap827wi.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
In-reply-to: <m3hap827wi.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.90-117-g4c20d72
Message-id: <1351845745.32519.0@numa-i>
X-Archives-Salt: aec87158-0847-4939-88dd-c77fcbddceb6
X-Archives-Hash: d22a220d1613312281b707fdce66f909

On 11/02/2012 12:57:24 AM, James Cloos wrote:

Many thanks, James.
Since app-portage/portage-utils is a portage specific package, it would  
be nice if it would take
all portage actions (like eselect) into account.

> 
> You might want to open an RFE bug report for app-portage/portage-utils
> suggesting that qfile gain the ability to do the (the logical  
> equivilent
> of) the above itself.

I've tried that, but the reponsible developer doesn't want to  
understand (even an advanced) user's need.
Helmut.