From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 760B215800A for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97204E0D0E; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44904E0D08 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet) by smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qQVX8-0005F5-3L for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:14:10 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Email clients Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:14:09 +0100 Message-ID: <13319002.uLZWGnKmhe@wstn> In-Reply-To: <5ae103ff53770b6d9eff69468422bad306e7f326.camel@connell.tech> References: <2313990.ElGaqSPkdT@wstn> <5ae103ff53770b6d9eff69468422bad306e7f326.camel@connell.tech> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01c-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 63ee60c4-21b9-46ab-bc71-43311b856c56 X-Archives-Hash: 84ee1444663e0f812e2eae678b36e7d8 On Monday, 31 July 2023 02:12:00 BST Matt Connell wrote: > On Sat, 2023-07-29 at 01:29 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I've been a loyal user of KMail for many years. (Loyal? Masochistic > > might be a better word.) It suits me exactly - or it would if it were > > reliable. It isn't, though, which drives me to consider alternatives. > > To present an alternative that I haven't seen mentioned in the thread: > Evolution. > > - Fully featured (calendar, contacts, tasks, memos) > - Oauth2 support > - Exchange Web Services support > - sane defaults > - sqlite database storage (as opposed to Akonadi's mysql) > - active community mailing list. I'll have a look at it - thanks. I see it's a gnome program and has 17 new dependencies (to this box). -- Regards, Peter.