From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RWqjc-0001CY-Fx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 14:38:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E00D921C108; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 14:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30ED521C15A for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 14:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6B420564 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 09:36:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 03 Dec 2011 09:36:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=letterboxes.org; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=mesmtp; bh=P1CMkj/zEpSYX3Lgcr7nRzCPTl4=; b=3Vnk6jPNSOA/zsyWwHVl48bF5zLg YwJFLkwtPsVnVaOPDXPLP53zaIdH7M5XXo4luXccC++ZUa8RXcmZvlpsz/tNFBKn FWBUShURHpvu1tSONYAIoyELFHyYOaIjO+TBWXzXjzoTQs0iUSiKYOpt84Ne5XMr g8tUl0dX+5axYk8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date :in-reply-to:references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=smtpout; bh=P1CMkj/zEpSYX3Lgcr7nRzCPTl4=; b=jJ1 cI2XIiEmUzEpFwlrv/i57xF6hyX1fO/6uwL3f61+5itp+7LecnZCmGB0068kApGS o+EJpr73oV3r31EdwMxij+NvgY/sq68X28eNqWyodgnm8AJ/cjI9qgpDEdcnga0w 4cd12zvd+JCL2GDINY6PDupeTRFGhy6trf56KfLc= X-Sasl-enc: 9HIKXmaz1Fv+lyPj1olsg2+hWrX/GmAlgbQxzTVzgGwa 1322923019 Received: from [192.168.31.28] (cpe-174-109-032-219.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.32.219]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D68A54824BC for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 09:36:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1322923017.8247.1.camel@stretch> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using libreoffice 3.5.0.0 yet? From: "Albert W. Hopkins" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 09:36:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Face: 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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 53ec6553-3d82-4eb6-a266-245667985a73 X-Archives-Hash: e7d891ce5dea357763731c2e72b80fda On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 14:43 -0800, walt wrote: > I just finished building it on my ~x86 and ~amd64 machines, and I'm > seeing a very annoying bug in localc on both of them. > > When I do anything that requires the window to repaint, like scrolling > or zooming, the screen doesn't repaint until I start clicking on the > spreadsheet. And then the screen repaints only in a rectangular area > under the mouse, about 3 x 4 cm. I have to click on every part of the > sheet to get the whole thing properly redrawn. Very strange, and very > annoying. > > A quick test of lowriter doesn't seem to show the same problem. > > Can anyone confirm or deny? > IIRC, libreoffice was released with *experimental* support for gtk3, and have acknowledged that there are issues with the gtk3 port. However Gentoo decided to enable gtk3 support by default. However it *should* work as expected when built against gtk2. -a