From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RV5Ad-0006D7-2w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:39:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEB5D21C09F; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBC821C02E for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E86C21781 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:37:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:37:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=letterboxes.org; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=mesmtp; bh=BxOgpmXPD8MathbecGXyxNdoGCg=; b=Nv8++tLKLEwleF+oY8P5PkGL6cYp 2wjyyxyOoeN/rU8MEuKMbN6eK2PSBr4xDEhdpYe6bYooFSu+zFWKSLK/skZxz6a5 eL7RO8LOTAdimQwvPimOxr2Hg3yoRxCQpjHSiBpvoPKrsesS6CRRs1dXhiuKtMg5 AXFASaEVo8WbMJU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date :in-reply-to:references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=smtpout; bh=BxOgpmXPD8MathbecGXyxNdoGCg=; b=Fis onBzhxcr9IZxX6R05sW/AZSJKfIU3h4uEUL9KSBKZ7ik5iBHrW0kFxNCzEQshtam +5GPGz4Au51mcndufnlCuVPsSqR243Tbg6N6K4T0p/bh0yA0VnNFLG5rYfKogOIo Dw05smtVBnkERdqlLbrSICkqLVSRLr0pEw4Jc3d4= X-Sasl-enc: nMVggmng9pajS5ccOP+dEtZy9Hpb3FCET6tWISXZu6U+ 1322501846 Received: from [192.168.0.119] (48-8-255-199.rev.celito.net [199.255.8.48]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D81AB8E00AA for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:37:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1322501846.6295.27.camel@stretch> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What happened to OpenRC 0.9.6? From: "Albert W. Hopkins" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:37:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <4ED28F6A.7090606@alyf.net> <1322483386.66469.4.camel@stretch> <1322497904.6295.6.camel@stretch> <20111128184152.03279681@rohan.example.com> Face: 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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 1c74da47-c713-45b5-a695-770cbcb2656d X-Archives-Hash: 3aa1f8d8474f84e6d642af5171c2b28b On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 17:19 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote: > I don't think that's fair. Perhaps nobody had compiled it using the > exact set of USE flags and the exast set of library versions and > configurations you were using, but I've never seen anything appear in > testing that was so broken it could be said that nobody had ever tried > to build it. I have.. even for packages w/o a USE flag. Granted, I'm not blaming the developers.. they have a lot of work to do. But it *does* happen. Usually the fix is easy enough. Just yesterday I reported a bug with webkit-gtk. The gtk2 version doesn't build at all (it's an upstream issue that they call a gtk3-specific function). No matter what combination of USE flags you use it wasn't gonna build, but it was obvious nobody had ever tried to build it, not even upstream apparently. :P -a