From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RV0Me-0006dL-MD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:31:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F52F21C104; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4158121C059 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E2021654 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:29:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:29:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=letterboxes.org; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=mesmtp; bh=nxGP6ivXp1ibOAKxFsjZZExznzU=; b=Hp32G4msMywn8buHzw0/vt7lvX/N /b8TKEL2xVuLLyUvjx4sOgoNhWkgzH/wcbEi5d40TbXn3GvhNUZfLdATxrScjKxu J98eshIYRUUM0/rOO9hJ9x7G+HJlmHt93S6tZ+snh8l7LF94g9y6Ld7ZarfVJi7y zFE2E3gf5HqqdEI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date :in-reply-to:references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=smtpout; bh=nxGP6ivXp1ibOAKxFsjZZExznzU=; b=V4a aTqR4P5Fv7SronJpeXco9cwbphRdGo8lAQ7dhj3eYCKm0C1SEGtc91HtlACiuEH3 JpIc2rvcDCB5SGfik4ItzQdAdVXFSBx128wjTJ34aOP1frseLwlanvx71Oqgyv2X Hz3pkADl8oocDJc0CyUIGK2tw6lxKrBEKi1uQRC0= X-Sasl-enc: C7A+df4dKX+OmXDhUgrkCa1xsvhY5Ykx2rPmbkTk4CNm 1322483386 Received: from [192.168.31.28] (cpe-174-109-032-219.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.32.219]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A11504824CE for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:29:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1322483386.66469.4.camel@stretch> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What happened to OpenRC 0.9.6? From: "Albert W. Hopkins" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:29:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4ED28F6A.7090606@alyf.net> References: <4ED28F6A.7090606@alyf.net> Face: 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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 096c8c2b-2780-4f31-92b0-a19e33472dd0 X-Archives-Hash: eaeba49eb198222490e894602e57ba66 On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:28 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote: > With 100% repeatability, mind you, which does raise same questions on > the amount of testing done before release. Yes, it's ~arch and > rc_parallel is explicitly marked "experimental", but it's not expected > to be completely and consistently broken, either. > > If that sounds like I'm ranting, it's because I just spent about an > hour > getting three machines affected by this problem back into working > state. > > If anyone still has it installed, it's time to sync and downgrade :) Sorry to add more to the whining but... Yes, you are in the testing tree. Yes, as a member of testing, *you* expect things will occasionally break, and it is *your* job to test things, break them, and report bugs. > And no, don't expect the devs to have tested something even they have told you is "experimental" and might not always work. If you don't like the unpredictability of testing, move to something more *stable* and don't enable options that come with a caveat. >