From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RV0DD-0004Kk-VH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:21:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 617DC21C0ED; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FBA21C061 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF6621681 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:19:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:19:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=letterboxes.org; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=mesmtp; bh=NVi1Ld8K8EJ0956gxR43AubjHO0=; b=08Y9kDW/FuAMXpfI6wKJQBrQB2/v EEUtWiAhqzbw+JUAD0Sp9FrNV9XTWsLBUoSDmmcETG0DxQFyL5/D2MLY7d+8vlhZ x0Tj/cgzBxbJoFrnmFoyUpeNdau30PKKi2KkWJG0xMVhy0u+2eQ8p7fR3qjCx39f x0cDlWu+DrovNwI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date :in-reply-to:references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=smtpout; bh=NVi1Ld8K8EJ0956gxR43AubjHO0=; b=hHX 5WOM8TtKDEwliZ4l26SczpNJ7UMC0cxbtAZ3T6nqSfNEgwtNN3oHmM5RsO5V9doO 4Y2bZM/UWoM9EITCtz/0Fu7Pi0qKuqU4LWF0EfM07u7X3MTPNdylEFzHobNZFvMp khgTBrvB0dRQOvE9vIP+ciTeJ7UqDxjqA7nW2BQ4= X-Sasl-enc: 1qZjVupyjKcHj9vndj6mlwa5NMEooTKW7VHj65NmWn1b 1322482787 Received: from [192.168.31.28] (cpe-174-109-032-219.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.32.219]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 621388E00C6 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:19:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1322482787.66469.1.camel@stretch> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick From: "Albert W. Hopkins" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:19:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4ED2B3E8.2000500@gmail.com> References: <4ED2A6D9.1020905@gmail.com> <2079275.oEENtEHvdm@pc> <4ED2B3E8.2000500@gmail.com> Face: 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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 82582610-71a7-41a7-81aa-5576ca585ff8 X-Archives-Hash: b6212fa70290e4a6f8edff6ea659a8cc On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 17:04 -0500, Colleen Beamer wrote: [..] > > yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert > > This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the > command. I was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had > before. Please don't tell me they took a great little program and > screwed it up! :-) > > Colleen > AFAIK ImageMagick has *always* been a suite of commands, and an optional GUI client. I have been used ImageMagick as far back as the early 90s and it's always been that way... perhaps we were using different ImageMagicks?