From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RUdsT-00060L-92 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:30:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 561B721C11D; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF78921C0EA for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA5C216B8 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 07:28:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 27 Nov 2011 07:28:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=letterboxes.org; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=mesmtp; bh=swuPEgogwGHixaGuCUX5Dp6epqU=; b=unz5cPtTWDA3xzEMVkRBrmPs16QI DF4I0IivUPCdFabCo78YUtiNhAG8rxLbrxcOyZWtXyyKXbua+qQnx4AZIwYr6WHB 6Wb9PY1bu2SjOHQETmJ4/IMwJpDlgbbiFe94rRx8K/aIn8AlmUw53HgyVcUJcmqQ owcEdwoF4kjRJn8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date :in-reply-to:references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=smtpout; bh=swuPEgogwGHixaGuCUX5Dp6epqU=; b=jUh RQUHkwRuB+1KUqTBODLADEKcfngrwoG60ztyryek3dfEJ209NfcZ9EB5QGRQvgz5 t9+wzjjeWXVJrzaDQpFN33qI5k9lWRR7OmC1+2ZrufJq6UbKLRdH1PfF0T7q7Sbc 36xxJy77ld+t4UjGZcJkDTvuUu/RuNPNkbCvwSAU= X-Sasl-enc: pLRPR9mF/NzrdKZ9j7bc+odI2nsmfAduxJDbEgs9PBVT 1322396927 Received: from [192.168.31.28] (cpe-174-109-032-219.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.32.219]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C9A98E00C6 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 07:28:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1322396926.6318.6.camel@stretch> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Any vbox made gentoo vm appliances available for dload From: "Albert W. Hopkins" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 07:28:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fwh9alcg.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <87mxbia3pn.fsf@newsguy.com> <1322358252.8604.3.camel@stretch> <87fwh9alcg.fsf@newsguy.com> Face: 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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 17cc05f9-324b-4604-bca4-c081f8b96aef X-Archives-Hash: b8313480991811cb3369d88e35605701 On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 04:52 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > Albert, I cloned your hg repo and tried to build from it, but it fails > at downloading gentoo-sources. Something about not being able to > resolve the kernel URLS. > > I suspect it is a problem in the ebuild itself, but I was not able to > find where `portage' is on disc during that build. I wanted to > attempt editing the ebuild but even with variable: > REMOVE_PORTAGE_TREE NO > I never find a `portage' directory. It grabs the sources from wherever they are specified (SRC_URI) in the ebuild. I just tried it and it worked for me: virtual-appliance # emerge --fetchonly gentoo-sources Calculating dependencies... done! >>> Fetching (1 of 1) sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.0.6 >>> Downloading 'http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/linux-3.0.tar.bz2' --2011-11-27 12:15:37-- http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/linux-3.0.tar.bz2 Resolving distfiles.gentoo.org... 216.165.129.135, 64.50.233.100, 64.50.236.52, ... Connecting to distfiles.gentoo.org|216.165.129.135|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 76753134 (73M) [application/x-tar] Saving to: `/usr/portage/distfiles/linux-3.0.tar.bz2' 100%[======================================>] 76,753,134 523K/s in 49s The portage tree itself (should be) in the chroot directory. The build will download the latest snapshot and unpack it in the chroot. Although, I did just try that and am getting failures. It seems the latest portage snapshot is currupt? virtual-appliance # make portage rsync --no-motd -L rsync://rsync.us.gentoo.org/gentoo/snapshots/portage-latest.tar.bz2 portage-latest.tar.bz2 touch sync_portage mkdir -p /root/virtual-appliance/vabuild tar xjpf "stage4/base-stage4.tar.bz2" -C /root/virtual-appliance/vabuild touch stage3 tar xjf portage-latest.tar.bz2 -C /root/virtual-appliance/vabuild/usr tar: Unexpected EOF in archive tar: Unexpected EOF in archive tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now make: *** [portage] Error 2 Anyone else getting this?