[gentoo-user] del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[gentoo-user] del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[Lars Madson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 389 bytes --]

Hi,

After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf files
that I update with etc-update.
Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only have
eth0 correctly setup.
It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, if it can
help.

My question is when this net.eth1 is called so that I could fix this wrong
routing?

thx
Laurent

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 514 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[Dale]

Lars Madson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf 
> files that I update with etc-update.
> Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only 
> have eth0 correctly setup.
> It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, if 
> it can help.
>
> My question is when this net.eth1 is called so that I could fix this 
> wrong routing?
>
> thx
> Laurent

If I understand this correctly, it sounds like udev has created a new 
nic for some reason.  Your file should be here and look something like this:

root@fireball / # cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# This file was automatically generated by the /lib64/udev/write_net_rules
# program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
#
# You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single
# line, and change only the value of the NAME= key.

# PCI device 0x10ec:0x8168 (r8169)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", 
ATTR{address}=="1c:6f:65:4c:91:c7", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", 
ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
root@fireball / #

If you only have one nic but have two lines there, I would just delete 
the whole file and reboot.  When you do and udev comes back up, it will 
create a new file and it resets its naming and such which should get you 
back to net.eth0 again.

I think you can kill udev and restart it if you don't want to reboot for 
some reason.

Again, this is if I understand the problem correctly.  If this makes 
sense, I may on track.  If not, I may be missing something and you may 
want to wait on someone else to chime in.

Dale

:-)  :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[Lars Madson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2177 bytes --]

hm there's only one line in my /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules:

# This file was automatically generated by the /lib64/udev/write_net_rules
# program run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
#
# You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single line.

# PCI device 0x10ec:0x8168 (r8169)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:1c:c0:5a:81:dc",
KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"


2011/9/4 Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>

> Lars Madson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf files
>> that I update with etc-update.
>> Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only have
>> eth0 correctly setup.
>> It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, if it
>> can help.
>>
>> My question is when this net.eth1 is called so that I could fix this wrong
>> routing?
>>
>> thx
>> Laurent
>>
>
> If I understand this correctly, it sounds like udev has created a new nic
> for some reason.  Your file should be here and look something like this:
>
> root@fireball / # cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-**persistent-net.rules
> # This file was automatically generated by the /lib64/udev/write_net_rules
> # program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
> #
> # You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single
> # line, and change only the value of the NAME= key.
>
> # PCI device 0x10ec:0x8168 (r8169)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> ATTR{address}=="1c:6f:65:4c:**91:c7", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0",
> ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
> root@fireball / #
>
> If you only have one nic but have two lines there, I would just delete the
> whole file and reboot.  When you do and udev comes back up, it will create a
> new file and it resets its naming and such which should get you back to
> net.eth0 again.
>
> I think you can kill udev and restart it if you don't want to reboot for
> some reason.
>
> Again, this is if I understand the problem correctly.  If this makes sense,
> I may on track.  If not, I may be missing something and you may want to wait
> on someone else to chime in.
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-)
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3056 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[Dale]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 574 bytes --]

Lars Madson wrote:
> hm there's only one line in my /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules:
>
> # This file was automatically generated by the /lib64/udev/write_net_rules
> # program run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
> #
> # You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single line.
>
> # PCI device 0x10ec:0x8168 (r8169)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:1c:c0:5a:81:dc", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
>

Must be something else then.  My new nickname is stumped.  lol  At least 
we know what it is not tho.

Dale

:-)  :-)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1273 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[Mark Knecht]

On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Lars Madson <rwx700@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf files
> that I update with etc-update.
> Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only have
> eth0 correctly setup.
> It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, if it can
> help.
> My question is when this net.eth1 is called so that I could fix this wrong
> routing?
> thx
> Laurent

Check /etc/init.d to ensure you have links for both eth0 and eth1.
Then check both /etc/conf.d/net &
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules to ensure you have both
interfaces set up as you want them, double checking each interface's
MAC address using ifconfig against any values listed in
70-persistent-net.rules, if any.

HTH,
Mark

[gentoo-user] Re: del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[walt]

On 09/04/2011 06:27 AM, Lars Madson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf files that I update with etc-update.
> Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only have eth0 correctly setup.
> It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, if it can help.
> 
> My question is when this net.eth1 is called so that I could fix this wrong routing?

If you are using only one ethernet adapter then you should remove
/etc/init.d/net.eth1.

If eth1 seems to exist somewhere but it really shouldn't exist, then
you should delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and reboot.
That should get rid of eth1.

If you really have two ethernet adapters then my answer is probably wrong.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[Lars Madson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1042 bytes --]

Yes I have only one ethernet adapter, eth0.
My /etc/init.d/net.eth1 is a symlink to net.lo
I can remove it.
But shouldn't it be a /etc/init.d/net.eth0 ?

my udev rule seems alright.

thx
Laurent

2011/9/4 walt <w41ter@gmail.com>

> On 09/04/2011 06:27 AM, Lars Madson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf
> files that I update with etc-update.
> > Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only
> have eth0 correctly setup.
> > It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, if it
> can help.
> >
> > My question is when this net.eth1 is called so that I could fix this
> wrong routing?
>
> If you are using only one ethernet adapter then you should remove
> /etc/init.d/net.eth1.
>
> If eth1 seems to exist somewhere but it really shouldn't exist, then
> you should delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and reboot.
> That should get rid of eth1.
>
> If you really have two ethernet adapters then my answer is probably wrong.
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1508 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[walt]

On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 17:14 +0200, Lars Madson wrote:
> Yes I have only one ethernet adapter, eth0.
> My /etc/init.d/net.eth1 is a symlink to net.lo
> I can remove it.
> But shouldn't it be a /etc/init.d/net.eth0 ?

Yes, net.eth0 should also be a symlink to net.lo.  If you don't have
that symlink then you should create it.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[Lars Madson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 520 bytes --]

SOLVED.
I deleted the /etc/init.d/net.eth1 and created a symlink for
/etc/init.d/net.eth0 to net.lo, without reboot.

Thank you!
Laurent

2011/9/5 walt <w41ter@gmail.com>

> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 17:14 +0200, Lars Madson wrote:
> > Yes I have only one ethernet adapter, eth0.
> > My /etc/init.d/net.eth1 is a symlink to net.lo
> > I can remove it.
> > But shouldn't it be a /etc/init.d/net.eth0 ?
>
> Yes, net.eth0 should also be a symlink to net.lo.  If you don't have
> that symlink then you should create it.
>
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 894 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

[Dale]

Lars Madson wrote:
> SOLVED.
> I deleted the /etc/init.d/net.eth1 and created a symlink for 
> /etc/init.d/net.eth0 to net.lo, without reboot.
>
> Thank you!
> Laurent

Have you restarted your network?  Just deleting the file isn't going to 
stop/start anything.  It will still be running the old way until you 
restart the services or reboot.

Dale

:-)  :-)