From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HrFMz-0002wM-2W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:36:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4OFZcFW030992; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:35:38 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4OFUaKH024997 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:30:37 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F88F649FB for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:30:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.025 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.025 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.025] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O9SY1zsCIjZI for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCDF649E7 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HrFGi-00017w-2m for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 17:30:24 +0200 Received: from 84-72-80-81.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.72.80.81]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 17:30:24 +0200 Received: from listen by 84-72-80-81.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 17:30:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Alexander Skwar Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: which -march flag to pick for Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf? Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:30:18 +0200 Organization: n/a Message-ID: <1310969.6LInUspViS@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 84-72-80-81.dclient.hispeed.ch User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: ecd1bc7b-248c-4132-a747-e6397f0ab922 X-Archives-Hash: 9ec62b5c04ad2019ef36966f5e954be0 Denis wrote: > Are these any options in the kernel and in the gcc to optimize for > Intel's Core 2 Duo chips? In the kernel: Yes. At least in 2.6.21. > And is there explicit support in the latest gentoo kernel for Core 2 > Duo, or does it go under Pentium 4 family? I'd say, it goes under Core2 -> MCORE2. Alexander Skwar -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list