From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QTyLx-0005le-SE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:38:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13E421C031; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.7.73]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3FC1C031 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from ironport-out-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.40]) by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0LMF00CRWFC8N0J0@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:36:08 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,333,1304287200"; d="scan'208";a="117139006" Received: from relay-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (HELO relay.rwth-aachen.de) ([134.130.7.75]) by ironport-in-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:36:07 +0200 Received: from numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de (numa-i.igpm.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.161.252]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.14.4+Sun/8.13.8/1) with ESMTP id p57Fa7dl018195 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:36:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from numa-i (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944E3E31 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:36:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:36:08 +0200 From: Helmut Jarausch Subject: [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.9 Message-id: <1307460968.6148.0@numa-i> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 52e39094fd6ebd882bd5d88cc8508a54 Hi, I'm puzzled again by portage's logic. When trying to emerge sys-fs/udisks-1.0.2-r4 it wants to downgrade sys-fs/udev from 171 to 168-r2 and sys-block/parted from 3.0 to 2.4 The udisks' ebuild contains >=sys-fs/udev-147[extras] >=sys-block/parted-1.8.8[device-mapper] sys-fs/udev hasn't an 'extra' use flag and sys-block/parted-3.0 has been emerged with the device-mapper use flag. But why does portage try to downgrade these to packages? Thanks for shedding some light on this one, Helmut.