public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Compare two Gentoo machines - please help
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:23:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305797019.14449.1@numa-i> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2000734.nCq92NXiV5@localhost>

Thanks to all of you who have tried to help me.

As it turned out, comparing MD5 sum is intractable,
/usr/lib64 alone contained more than 500,000 files !

The /etc tree didn't show significant differences.

So, I resorted to keep my 4 cores busy over the weekend to
re-emerge the whole machine.

That's the price for a highly configurable and up-to-date system like 
Gentoo - but I like it. But it's the first time I needed to do it since
several years, now.

Helmut.

On 05/17/2011 10:21:16 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 17:57:42 Blakawk wrote:
> 
> >  As far as i remember, i don't see why modification times will 
> enter
> in
> >  the md5sum computation process, as they are not part of the file
> but of
> >  the filesystem's inode... it's definitely possible to compare two
> >  binaries on two different system if they are compiled with the 
> same
> >  compiler version and libraries 
> 
> in theory. In practice only a slight change here and there - might
> result in 
> huge changes. 'Almost identical' but the things that are not 
> identical
> will 
> screw you up. Almost identical is like 'totally different' in this
> case.
> 
> Instead wasting time comparing the machines, he should find the
> culprit for 
> the segfault. KDE's backtracking tool (drkonqi) and strace help a lot
> with 
> that. If he knows where it fails, he at least has a chance to find 
> out
> why.
> 
> 
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-19  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-17 13:42 [gentoo-user] Compare two Gentoo machines - please help Helmut Jarausch
2011-05-17 14:52 ` Paul Hartman
2011-05-17 16:28   ` Leonardo Guilherme
2011-05-17 15:03 ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-05-17 15:52 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-05-17 15:57   ` Blakawk
2011-05-17 20:21     ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-05-19  9:23       ` Helmut Jarausch [this message]
2011-05-17 17:52   ` Stroller
2011-05-17 16:05 ` [gentoo-user] " James

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1305797019.14449.1@numa-i \
    --to=jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox