From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OHo3q-0000Na-ED for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 01:08:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CA61E09FE for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 01:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.pcorp.com.au (mail2.pcorp.com.au [150.101.72.19]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB71FE0830 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.pcorp.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0434FA00021 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 10:27:50 +0930 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.pcorp.com.au Received: from mail2.pcorp.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.pcorp.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LH8sUwuJyc9M; Fri, 28 May 2010 10:27:49 +0930 (CST) Received: from [172.16.0.52] (unknown [172.16.0.52]) by mail2.pcorp.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9AEA00020 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 10:27:49 +0930 (CST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] danger-deep From: Iain Buchanan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <1274921410.5721.5.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:26:03 +0930 Message-ID: <1275008163.5721.31.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ebebf25f-d46c-4c2f-aa84-0ffdf6b53ae8 X-Archives-Hash: db823c5ddda54d971760af8b60057116 On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 14:18 +0300, Arttu V. wrote: > On 5/27/10, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > Doesn't run here. Something to do with getting the available > > resolutions: > > > > Anyone know about SDL? > > I really don't, but I'm just wondering if you are looking at the 0.3.0 > source tarball code or their svn trunk? system.cpp is quite different > in the trunk, including changes which probably should add support for > "less common" screen sizes and modes. 0.3.0. I just emerged the version in portage. I might try svn later (when I'm not at work ;) -- Iain Buchanan Experience is that marvelous thing that enables you recognize a mistake when you make it again. -- Franklin P. Jones