From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OHW4z-0002XZ-A5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 05:56:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58924E0AD1; Thu, 27 May 2010 05:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6896CE0AD1 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 05:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from UNKNOWN (imp5-g19.priv.proxad.net [172.20.243.135]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688C34B0134 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 07:55:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by UNKNOWN (Postfix, from userid 0) id 60EAD28F4C2A7; Thu, 27 May 2010 07:55:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ([88.176.244.27]) by imp.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 07:55:15 +0200 Message-ID: <1274939715.4bfe094344e8a@imp.free.fr> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 07:55:15 +0200 From: alain.didierjean@free.fr To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Something happened on the way to X : solved References: <1274605230.4bf8eeae17fc7@imp.free.fr> <4BF8F839.5060404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BF8F839.5060404@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8 X-Originating-IP: 88.176.244.27 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: a308681c-7774-4389-959b-41094fdf4e87 X-Archives-Hash: 9ee6f8274062099d64660c992701e7ae Selon Dale : > alain.didierjean@free.fr wrote: > > Installing Gentoo on my computer... with > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=3D"amd64" > > VIDEO_CARDS=3D"fglrx" > > INPUT_DEVICES=3D"evdev" > > > > everything's fine until I emerge xorg-server, which returns: > > > > [ebuild N ] x11-base/xorg-drivers-1.7 INPUT_DEVICES=3D"evdev -ac= ecad > -aiptek > > -joystick -keyboard -mouse -penmount -synaptics -tslib -virtualbox -v= mmouse > > -void -wacom" VIDEO_CARDS=3D"fglrx -apm -ark -ast -chips -cirrus -dum= my > -epson > > -fbdev (-geode) -glint -i128 (-i740) (-impact) -intel -mach64 -mga > -neomagic > > (-newport) -nv (-nvidia) -r128 -radeon -radeonhd -rendition -s3 -s3vi= rge > -savage > > -siliconmotion -sis -sisusb (-sunbw2) (-suncg14) (-suncg3) (-suncg6) > (-sunffb) > > (-sunleo) (-suntcx) -tdfx -tga -trident -tseng -v4l -vesa -via -virtu= albox > > -vmware (-voodoo) (-xgi)" > > [ebuild N ] x11-libs/libXinerama-1.1 USE=3D"-debug" > > [ebuild N ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.7.6 USE=3D"hal nptl xorg -deb= ug -dmx > -ipv6 > > -kdrive -minimal -sdl -tslib" > > [ebuild N ] x11-drivers/ati-drivers-9.11 USE=3D"modules (multili= b) > -debug" > > [ebuild N ] x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev-2.3.2 USE=3D"-debug" > > [blocks B ]>=3Dx11-base/xorg-server-1.7.0 (">=3Dx11-base/xorg-ser= ver-1.7.0" > is > > blocking x11-drivers/ati-drivers-9.11) > > > > * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be > > * installed at the same time on the same system. > > > > ('ebuild', '/', 'x11-drivers/ati-drivers-9.11', 'merge') pulled in= by > > x11-drivers/ati-drivers required by ('ebuild', '/', > > 'x11-base/xorg-drivers-1.7', 'merge') > > > > ('ebuild', '/', 'x11-base/xorg-server-1.7.6', 'merge') pulled in b= y > > >=3Dx11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r7 required by ('ebuild', '/', > > 'x11-drivers/ati-drivers-9.11', 'merge') > > xorg-server > > >=3Dx11-base/xorg-server-1.6.3 required by ('ebuild', '/', > > 'x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev-2.3.2', 'merge') > > > > > > ------------------ SNIP------------------------- > > I don't use ATI but I think I read here a while back that ATI drivers > have to be compatible with certain versions of xorg. You may want to > see if you can use a newer version of the ATI drivers. > > You can look at the ebuild to see what exact versions. From what i > read, it looks like you may need the 10 series instead of the 9 series. > Then again, it is sometimes backwards from what I am thinking. May be > worth testing anyway. > emerging ~amd64 drivers (x11-drivers/ati-drivers-10-4) did the job.