From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NcqWD-00015K-7k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:28:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B529CE0951; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.pcorp.com.au (mail2.pcorp.com.au [150.101.72.19]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423BEE0951 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.pcorp.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD88C107406A for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:58:00 +0930 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.pcorp.com.au Received: from mail2.pcorp.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.pcorp.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iR0M2ME1QpiV; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:58:00 +0930 (CST) Received: from [172.16.0.52] (unknown [172.16.0.52]) by mail2.pcorp.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F0B1074069 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:58:00 +0930 (CST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] mysterious syslog message "." From: Iain Buchanan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <201002031857.47353.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> References: <1264775202.6646.47.camel@localhost> <201002030005.04214.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <1265153239.3995.16.camel@localhost> <201002031857.47353.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:56:49 +0930 Message-ID: <1265246809.17653.14.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: eac8241d-e097-4fcd-af96-14d874b47351 X-Archives-Hash: 5ec967edeaed896ecea9f360910d74fb On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 18:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Wednesday 03 February 2010 01:27:19 Iain Buchanan wrote: > > I appreciate the humour, but so far for me, it's Just Worked(TM). Even > > with this log file annoyance, it's still "working". > > You're the lucky one :-) > > nm seems to work OK on the RedHats and SuSEs of this world, I've not seen many > folk get it work smoothly on Gentoo Wow, I must remember to buy a lottery ticket on the way home :) Seriously, it was just emerge and go! > > I found a post that suggested in fact iwlagn wasn't reloading properly > > after a suspend, so I've added "UnloadModules iwlagn" > > to /etc/hibernate/common.conf and so far I haven't seen the spurious log > > messages (cross my fingers). > > Unfortunately, that sounds all too realistic. I gave up trying to use suspend > some time ago after battling with wirelss and graphics hardware that wouldn't > suspend/resume reliably. But with 4G of RAM here, I find it doesn't take much > longer to power down/cold start than suspend/resume really? 4G RAM, Core 2 Duo T9500 @ 2.60GHz here, and hibernate is much faster. Do you have an SSD? Resuming with gnome, compiz, firefox, etc. already loaded is supremely better than my boot up AND log-in time otherwise. -- Iain Buchanan "Pets are always a great help in times of stress. And in times of starvation too, o'course." -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)