From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbbPc-00010u-EN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:08:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56686E07F2; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.pcorp.com.au (mail2.pcorp.com.au [150.101.72.19]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81BDE07F2 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.pcorp.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA047107405B for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:37:23 +0930 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.pcorp.com.au Received: from mail2.pcorp.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.pcorp.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h1Goo7tsZdxi; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:37:23 +0930 (CST) Received: from [172.16.0.52] (dsl-203-113-237-164.SA.netspace.net.au [203.113.237.164]) by mail2.pcorp.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11FA107405A for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:37:22 +0930 (CST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Question about RDEPEND From: Iain Buchanan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <201001310312.19401.Warp_7@gmx.de> References: <201001300332.56327.Warp_7@gmx.de> <1264831996.6646.63.camel@localhost> <201001310312.19401.Warp_7@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:36:21 +0930 Message-ID: <1264950381.1692.2.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4c310523-8d1d-40e9-9ed0-fdefa1999d94 X-Archives-Hash: 1133c0f266843f21f84fcbbd61639b70 On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 03:12 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2010 schrieb Iain Buchanan: > > What is the complete emerge output? Look for any masked or license > > restricted packages. I added this to /etc/portage/package.license: > > dev-java/sun-jdk dlj-1.1 > > Indeed there's an output concerning a lincence. I ignored it because in the > past I had loads of messages there about masked or missing ebuilds due to the > phasing-out of KDE3, which I still run. In that case though I would have > expected portage wanting to remove sun-jdk because of a licence issue. unless you have sun-jdk in your world file, which would happen if you ever specifically emerged it. In that case sun-jdk would not be un-merged because you asked for it, and icedtea would be pulled in being the only non-masked dependency of the virtual... I think! > Oh > well, guess that's solved then. :-) hope so! -- Iain Buchanan Rick: "How can you close me up? On what grounds?" Renault: "I'm shocked! Shocked! To find that gambling is going on here." Croupier (handing money to Renault): "Your winnings, sir." Renault:"Oh. Thank you very much." -- Casablanca