From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N4njX-0007Ih-EG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:37:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8339E0AA3; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 03:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.121]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7E5E0AA3 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 03:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from basement.kutulu.org ([97.103.123.104]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20091102033729394.QIBD20461@cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com> for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 03:37:29 +0000 Received: by basement.kutulu.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id E4BF07D8442; Sun, 1 Nov 2009 22:37:28 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-gr0 (2008-06-10) on basement X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5-gr0 Received: from [192.168.69.51] (unknown [192.168.69.51]) by basement.kutulu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA8017D8314 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2009 22:37:28 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] When masked pkg not in [...]profiles/package.mask, where is it From: Mike Edenfield To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <87eiohu0u0.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <87eiohu0u0.fsf@newsguy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ANSI_X3.4-1968" Organization: KutuluWare Software Services Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:39:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1257133173.3037.7.camel@platypus> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0fb797a2-173f-4f11-ae0c-3e3844b60865 X-Archives-Hash: 8bb6f2598d095e7df615beb96facac19 On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 20:17 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > When a package comes up as masked in an eix search, they are usually > found in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask, but if a particular > masked package is not listed there... where else would it be. > > I see libtool is masked above version 1.5.26-r1, but is not in > /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask... According to my eix output, libtool isn't masked, just keyworded (and only 1.5.26-r1 specifically): [I] sys-devel/libtool Available versions: (1.3) 1.3.5 (1.5) 1.5.26 (~)1.5.26-r1 2.2.6a **9999 {test vanilla} That information is per-ebuild, found in the KEYWORDS line in the .ebuild file; it will have keyword ~x86 or ~amd64 instead of simply x86 or amd64. --Mike