From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N08IE-0001ur-G8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:34:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88AA5E0655; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6197DE0655 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24926794A for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:33:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.877 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.877 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.278, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geaSynyZHo3j for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out5.iinet.net.au (outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out5.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.105]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059C567C9F for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:33:51 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAD/23Ep8qXZx/2dsb2JhbADZBIQxBIJG X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,590,1249228800"; d="scan'208";a="47641219" Received: from unknown (HELO moriah.localdomain) ([124.169.118.113]) by outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out5.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2009 14:33:48 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moriah.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC775172D9C9 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:33:48 +0800 (WST) Received: from moriah.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (moriah.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2uHFvNDHU01 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:33:44 +0800 (WST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (rattus [192.168.1.2]) by moriah.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB65013EC0BC for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:33:44 +0800 (WST) Subject: [gentoo-user] Java and glsa-check From: William Kenworthy To: gentoo-user List Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Home in Perth! Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:33:44 +0800 Message-Id: <1256020424.13000.21.camel@rattus> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 153cdc20-bf81-4cf4-ab6b-d9250ecb6cbd X-Archives-Hash: b50c516d8ae0817cb6b41faa334b8ab1 I have multiple systems affected by this: moriah ~ # glsa-check -p affected Checking GLSA 200804-20 >>> The following updates will be performed for this GLSA: >>> For the following packages, no upgrade path exists: dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.20moriah ~ # Yet 1.5.0.20 is supposed to be unaffected. Is this the slotting issue bug 106677 is talking about? I currently have java 1.5 and 1.6, jdk and jre's present on in various combinations - all versions look like they should be ok, all want to apply the glsa but say there is no upgrade path ... BillK -- William Kenworthy Home in Perth!