From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11439158042 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 01:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F243E093E; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 01:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01b.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EA30E092E for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 01:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=cube.localnet) by smarthost01b.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1t33Q4-00CBMh-Gp for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 01:10:45 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NFS mounting Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 02:10:45 +0100 Message-ID: <12537376.O9o76ZdvQC@cube> In-Reply-To: <2345896.ElGaqSPkdT@rogueboard> References: <12539492.O9o76ZdvQC@cube> <2345314.ElGaqSPkdT@cube> <2345896.ElGaqSPkdT@rogueboard> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 02606bb6-1806-4535-9754-05571e6d933c X-Archives-Hash: c759aeadb419d4e4066a496ae65258fc On Monday 21 October 2024 09:22:37 BST Michael wrote: > Assuming all required directories are on the same fs, what happens if you > *only* export the parent directory? Something like this: > > /mnt/nfs \ > 192.168.178.7/32(rw,sync,insecure,no_subtree_check,all_squash,anonuid=250,an > ongid=250) Actually, the converse turned out to be right. Removing the top-level /mnt/nfs spec from /etc/exports allowed the whole thing to spring into life. Go figure, as they say in the colonies. ;) -- Regards, Peter.