From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12ABC1382C5 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 09:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E12FE0919; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 09:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 438E0E0899 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 09:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jfgp2-0000ZI-HB for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 09:33:32 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Qtcurve, anyone? Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 10:33:32 +0100 Message-ID: <12533238.uLZWGnKmhe@peak> In-Reply-To: <9727870.nUPlyArG6x@peak> References: <4258230.LvFx2qVVIh@peak> <9727870.nUPlyArG6x@peak> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01c-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: c7b5935e-df36-44d4-a4bc-2bed78f0acb9 X-Archives-Hash: d3125220a51859cf3da4306747bb404d On Sunday, 31 May 2020 17:06:55 BST I wrote: > I'm confused. Now I get the same error in app-emulation/virtualbox-5.2.40. > It seems I'm lacking a core component of Qt. Qtcurve is now installed, thanks to Stefano's patch, but I still have the same problem in virtualbox. I see 69 .h files, so which one needs a similar patch? And why is this only affecting me? -- Regards, Peter.