From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MdASb-0000RE-Ce for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:13:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABAFFE04F5; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.147]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D609E04F5 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so699722eyb.10 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:13:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bUtKKk/7JRV16RR0kdGN7rQ1YJyCClcgXOmx5ScsNsQ=; b=gSn23oXZGlW46mZwU0JcO1rbEVboB9d8yZT2FWtdoQHiGwtg2CqNE0drlVNNb1zTNR yXNOxr9GzVkJwCdW+yIG4DSJ17pNhuSivZZIGwdxLi1L08SEF9jdJNtZcoYHMbhyAOQQ 38hPg2TW//CqB++FeJOgVnuiYFJ2DU+fDbd3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=IwVKU4G7bJB4Eche7/WVuwHZ7YPwgjHxZq0ixWQ4It8zXEPRXmUkid6E2qh4CS2dII ZGX/I2Glp1PIL7eoMGy9TuKCzRE4aZynVR3DnENf6x3XTkd1y5vRzoGBThRlAgGTi+Tq gIx4bHxLU7Xq2PZIANRTt3Zc7Pxm5HcZVGz0o= Received: by 10.210.138.3 with SMTP id l3mr7591849ebd.20.1250547226914; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.129? (234.145.220.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.220.145.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm817890eyd.35.2009.08.17.15.13.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] problems with the web browsers From: M Daniel R M <4.magarzo@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200908162001.47872.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> References: <1250440812.7063.28.camel@mdel> <200908162001.47872.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:15:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1250547317.14051.62.camel@mdel> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8e4352e2-994e-4d7f-911a-5ab01df9637d X-Archives-Hash: 40770839c4239b02cf6283af5163566e On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 20:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Sunday 16 August 2009 18:40:12 M Daniel R M wrote: > > Konqueror: very stable indeed, but it couldn't be at another way since > > it's a key piece of the KDE environment... The problem comes when I want > > to fill in forms (you know... web pages for registering, etc.). It stops > > many times without giving us an alert message or some kind of > > explanation, so you have to deduce that the problem is not from the > > website, but the browser instead. > > > > I don't know whether problems come from java or whatever..., I've > > checked my konqueror preferences and I'd bet they are all OK.. > > javascript support in konqueror sucks. > I always thought that here it isn't my fault (that is, incomplete installs and so on..) > For everything else it's actually OK. One of these days it will use webkit as > the backend and then things might improve. Until then, I'm afraid you are SOL. > ASAP, please! I think konqueror lacks of such abilities, and they are practically essential nowadays, but apart from that..., other capabilities are fine IMHO (speed, stability, ...). Ops! In addition, I realize now that sometimes konqueror renders (shows) some webpages badly (you know, things placed in the frame where they shouldn't, etc.) Regards, Daniel R. Magarzo