From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MUKcK-0004QJ-QS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:15:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D07BE0057; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06180E0057 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49243BB6EA for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:15:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:15:18 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: vG9Op82zPDzTH8zkZVTOTjRY+MMNyacw9x5S9f+6Ul/F 1248441318 Received: from [10.11.243.204] (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.202]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6104BBDCD for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:15:18 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xf86-video-intel-2.8 and compiz -> hard locks From: Albert Hopkins To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1248437198.2195.12.camel@centar> References: <1248437198.2195.12.camel@centar> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:16:28 -0400 Message-Id: <1248441388.26713.0.camel@brotherus.corp.redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 39a3df8f-5d6c-4e60-9d02-81ed2e39db80 X-Archives-Hash: b06d063e4494a0a8adeb19341071480a I forgot to mention. This seems to be compiz-specific. If I run metacity, even with metacity's compositing manager enabled, I don't experience this issue. -a