From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F06158041 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5CE2E2A4C; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0980E2A31 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=cube.localnet) by smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1rosB7-000dWY-0f for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:48:25 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Stage-3 and profile 23.x Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:48:24 +0000 Message-ID: <12402631.O9o76ZdvQC@cube> In-Reply-To: <4884332.GXAFRqVoOG@rogueboard> References: <12405661.O9o76ZdvQC@cube> <4884332.GXAFRqVoOG@rogueboard> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01c-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 9ec5aa7d-44cd-452a-9717-7590a87b406d X-Archives-Hash: 5b7191c295887d04b2d6414333b9edb4 On Monday, 25 March 2024 16:52:19 GMT Michael wrote: > The default OpenRC installation now assumes a merged-usr fs structure - > therefore make sure you select the appropriate profile in a new installation. I was wondering about that. Now that we have 23.0 in place, are we meant to change to merged-usr? Should I run the eponymous script? -- Regards, Peter.