From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LSH37-0002vx-TC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:30:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B54E9E0443; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.admin-box.com (mx01.admin-box.com [78.47.249.108]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB51CE0443 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx01.admin-box.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E2F2024B5C for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:30:10 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx01.admin-box.com Received: from mx01.admin-box.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx01.admin-box.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e1vUMi-dlzRl for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:30:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.136] (e178051159.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.51.159]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@troeder.de) by mx01.admin-box.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69D62024748 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:30:07 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] X-forwarding questions From: Daniel Troeder To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10901271425l263de05an980cf1cdc9fc6e2c@mail.gmail.com> References: <49bf44f10901250922p39776d96k5ade574b9bf1dc5e@mail.gmail.com> <497F7901.8020304@coolmail.se> <49bf44f10901271425l263de05an980cf1cdc9fc6e2c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ku4z3x9ULnFThut6+jvQ" Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:30:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1233174606.7714.13.camel@maya.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 X-Archives-Salt: 5a5f7821-3d6c-40f5-9ffb-3808b97414bd X-Archives-Hash: 2a80cfc117825c1c94cbe3c4047cd151 --=-ku4z3x9ULnFThut6+jvQ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Dienstag, den 27.01.2009, 14:25 -0800 schrieb Grant: > Using -C, gimp is about 10x more responsive than if I don't. I was > surprised too. My laptop and the "remote" system are 15 feet away > from each other on the same wireless network, with the router in > between. Most X programs store their bitmaps in the X server - not the program. You can see this if you look at the memory usage. So lots of data is transfered if using gimp :) BTW: If you can use cable instead of wireless, you may have a _much_ better experience, because of the latency that wireless adds. BTW2: If your bandwidth is really small, you should use VNC instead of ssh-X - though that's not to nice with image editing :) Bye, Daniel --=-ku4z3x9ULnFThut6+jvQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmAwE4ACgkQg3+4tbudSIf49wCeIhIdYkEjj6L+vY6ACX92tjf7 M2MAn2d3/Uls/AdsBRASrTumPj56GWYw =9wYv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ku4z3x9ULnFThut6+jvQ--