From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AB5715800F for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 14:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 902D6E0837; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 14:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01a.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01a.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 512C6E0769 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 14:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet) by smarthost01a.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLmOv-00067T-OQ for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 14:41:53 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Soft scrolling on framebuffer consoles - New version of the patch - with GPM handling. Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 14:41:53 +0000 Message-ID: <12167623.O9o76ZdvQC@wstn> In-Reply-To: References: <4776889.GXAFRqVoOG@wstn> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01a-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: dc0bdd03-6ab0-4814-a96d-c76560d5fdc6 X-Archives-Hash: cf73ebf20cfef9e928cba578ed6831a0 On Friday, 27 January 2023 22:31:17 GMT Alan Mackenzie wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:24:41 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote: --->8 > > I've attached the reject files. > > Thanks for these! It looks like it'll probably be straightforward to > amend the patch for 6.1.8. Are you currently running 6.1.8 as your main > kernel? Yes Alan, I'm running ~amd64, so 6.1.8 is the current kernel. I have 5.15.88 as a backup. -- Regards, Peter.