From: Richard Marzan <richardmarzan@optonline.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Status of Gentoo
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:33:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1206599615.7534.29.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47DB0001.3000209@gmail.com>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> | On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell <dan@spore.ath.cx> wrote:
> |
> | It's an interesting question and one I've not tried to test. Does an
> | AMD64 machine running a 32-bit or 64-bit install run faster or slower
> | with one or the other. For all of my everyday work - Gnome, Firefox,
> | web browsing, email, MythTV, etc., it's been my assumption that there
> | wouldn't be any noticeble difference. I run 64-bit but assume I'd run
> | at more or less the same speed if I ran 32-bit. I may be wrong. Anyone
> | have any measured data? Same machine, two installs?
>
> I have a few numbers from genlop -t
>
> *32-bit*
>
> ~ * www-client/mozilla-firefox
> ~ Sat Dec 29 00:35:39 2007 >>> www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.11
> ~ merge time: 11 minutes and 30 seconds.
>
> ~ Sat Feb 9 12:43:52 2008 >>> www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12
> ~ merge time: 10 minutes and 44 seconds.
>
> ~ * mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird
> ~ Sat Aug 4 13:25:28 2007 >>> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.6
> ~ merge time: 18 minutes and 49 seconds.
>
> ~ Fri Nov 23 12:57:01 2007 >>> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.9
> ~ merge time: 10 minutes and 37 seconds.
>
> ~ * kde-base/kdelibs
> ~ Sat Dec 29 09:31:18 2007 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.7-r3
> ~ merge time: 18 minutes and 56 seconds.
>
> ~ Sat Dec 29 11:07:40 2007 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.7-r3
> ~ merge time: 19 minutes and 37 seconds.
>
> ~ Wed Jan 30 20:38:52 2008 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.8-r3
> ~ merge time: 18 minutes and 19 seconds.
>
> ~ Tue Feb 26 20:16:28 2008 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.8-r3
> ~ merge time: 21 minutes and 38 seconds.
>
> * app-office/openoffice
> ~ Fri Nov 23 19:14:12 2007 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.3.0
> ~ merge time: 1 hour and 48 seconds.
>
> ~ Sat Dec 29 01:35:35 2007 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.3.1
> ~ merge time: 59 minutes and 56 seconds.
>
> ~ Tue Feb 5 11:51:26 2008 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.3.1-r1
> ~ merge time: 1 hour, 4 minutes and 28 seconds.
>
>
> *64-bit*
>
> * www-client/mozilla-firefox
> ~ Tue Jan 1 14:14:50 2008 >>> www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.11
> ~ merge time: 8 minutes and 43 seconds.
>
> ~ Wed Feb 20 21:39:03 2008 >>> www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12
> ~ merge time: 8 minutes and 39 seconds.
>
> * mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird
> ~ Tue Jan 1 14:25:01 2008 >>> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.9
> ~ merge time: 9 minutes and 9 seconds.
>
> ~ Sun Mar 9 01:22:43 2008 >>> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.12
> ~ merge time: 8 minutes and 2 seconds.
>
> * kde-base/kdelibs
> ~ Tue Jan 1 11:04:37 2008 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.7-r3
> ~ merge time: 16 minutes and 47 seconds.
>
> ~ Wed Feb 20 22:01:22 2008 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.8-r3
> ~ merge time: 18 minutes and 12 seconds.
>
> * app-office/openoffice
> ~ Fri Mar 14 21:23:57 2008 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.3.1-r1
> ~ merge time: 48 minutes and 45 seconds.
>
> These times are from the same machine:
> abit ip35 pro, c2quad q6600 (2.4ghz), 4gb ram, (320+320) sataII raid0 (155-MB/s)
>
> - --
> Filipe Sousa
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFH2wABbQdNYqwwwCwRAvWsAKCSjwXXHIT2agHd7Hh+7ZwaTOzQeQCdG1Ctol
> M29wU4QkWfsgkRO1jgipuKw=
> =5cd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
My advice is not to use it yet. I thought 64-bit computers could bring
in a whole new dimension into the computing world. going from 16 to 32
bits was a significant improvement in terms of applications and what you
can do at a given time. You can see the big difference in Operating
systems and programs of various application going from 16 to 32. This
64-bit and even dual-core thing has still to bear fruit -- at least for
me. It's not faster by any noticeable difference and most applications
are not optimized for it. I won't switch until I know I can gain a major
advantage utilizing this technology.I have 2gigs of ram and still have
yet to use more than 200M at anytime. So, why do I need 8 gigs of memory
or more.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-27 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-11 7:22 [gentoo-user] Status of Gentoo Jamie Dobbs
2008-03-11 7:35 ` Dale
2008-03-11 7:39 ` KH
2008-03-11 8:41 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-03-11 9:12 ` Dale
2008-03-11 9:26 ` Uwe Thiem
2008-03-11 9:29 ` Kristian Poul Herkild
2008-03-11 9:35 ` Robert Stockdale IV
2008-03-11 9:45 ` Dale
2008-03-11 9:45 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-03-11 10:03 ` Dale
2008-03-11 10:48 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-03-11 10:51 ` Amar Cosic
2008-03-11 10:59 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-03-12 7:19 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-03-11 11:05 ` Uwe Thiem
2008-03-11 9:32 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-03-11 10:02 ` Dale
2008-03-11 10:23 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-03-11 17:31 ` Naga
2008-03-11 18:32 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-03-11 19:36 ` Dale
2008-03-11 20:08 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-03-11 20:24 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-03-11 10:04 ` Uwe Thiem
2008-03-11 10:23 ` Dale
2008-03-11 11:04 ` Uwe Thiem
2008-03-11 10:15 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2008-03-11 10:55 ` Uwe Thiem
2008-03-11 12:41 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2008-03-12 7:23 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-03-12 13:34 ` Matthias Bethke
2008-03-14 19:09 ` Chris Brennan
2008-03-11 15:13 ` KH
2008-03-11 19:38 ` BRM
2008-03-11 7:37 ` KH
2008-03-11 7:50 ` Mike Mazur
2008-03-11 8:42 ` Matthias Fechner
2008-03-11 11:42 ` Peter Humphrey
2008-03-11 17:00 ` Mark Knecht
2008-03-14 18:23 ` Dan Farrell
2008-03-14 19:06 ` Mark Knecht
2008-03-14 19:56 ` Dan Farrell
2008-03-14 20:24 ` Mark Knecht
2008-03-14 20:57 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-03-14 22:45 ` Filipe Sousa
2008-03-14 23:02 ` Dan Farrell
2008-03-14 23:36 ` Mark Knecht
2008-03-14 23:56 ` Filipe Sousa
2008-03-27 6:33 ` Richard Marzan [this message]
2008-03-11 17:34 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2008-03-13 12:04 ` Enrico Weigelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1206599615.7534.29.camel@localhost \
--to=richardmarzan@optonline.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox