From: Iain Buchanan <iaindb@netspace.net.au>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ?
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:01:55 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1200357115.12251.20.camel@orpheus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20080114T192124-949@post.gmane.org>
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:47 +0000, James wrote:
> Jil Larner <jil <at> gnoo.eu> writes:
>
>
> > May I suggest you split the discussion if you continue about licensing,
> > so we can keep a clear topic on Daniel's come back ?
>
> I only use licensing as an example (that I'm willing to defend
> as long as it takes) to support the notion of vehicles to
> generate revenue around the 'gentoo engine'. After all, if
> you look at Daniel's recent past, he's been searching for ways
> to use Gentoo, to *make money*. Several folks have pointed out
> that the majority of people believe that using (gentoo) linux to
> make money is a good idea. Daniel has been with lots of ventures
> in the recent past. Gentoo is his next 'bidness'.
By friday (or saturday) we will know whether or not DRobbins has been
accepted, and shortly after you will know if it is his plan to
commercialise Gentoo (which I personally don't think he is about to do).
If he does (there are a lot of if's leading up to this) then surely you
can apply to work on the project. And just like Fedora, there will be a
"free" split.
If this doesn't happen, you can of course start your own commercial
Gentoo project. Write an installer that can handle multiple PC's
easily, polish some business aspects (printer admin, domain control,
security), and write some scripts to share the compile amongst multiple
business machines and install from packages, and away you go.
I don't see a problem with the RedHat / Fedora model, but it doesn't
suit Gentoo in it's current form. Firstly, Fedora is the spin off, and
I can't see Gentoo agreeing to accept direction from a commercial
parent. Secondly if the current team were to become the commercial
entity and spin off a free child, I can see from the attitudes of the
current devs that they are not focused on a highly polished and business
attractive product. They're not interested in a flashy installer for
example (which is fine) or binary packages.
In fact, given the "love" that the collective devs have for DRobbins, I
can see them either say "no", or nothing at all. Which means either
DRobbins, or someone else, will take Gentoo and fork it. The two
distributions will probably grow to hate each other, although they may
occasionally share problems and fixes, but certainly neither will have
control or direction over the other.
--
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>
Got a complaint about the Internal Revenue Service?
Call the convenient toll-free "IRS Taxpayer Complaint Hot Line Number":
1-800-AUDITME
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-15 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-12 9:11 [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ? alain.didierjean
2008-01-12 10:31 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 12:08 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-12 12:55 ` Mick
2008-01-12 13:34 ` Dale
2008-01-12 17:07 ` Richard Marzan
2008-01-12 17:22 ` Renat Golubchyk
2008-01-12 17:49 ` Hal Martin
2008-01-12 18:13 ` Richard Marzan
2008-01-12 21:17 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13 14:07 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 14:23 ` Naga Toro
2008-01-13 14:33 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 15:06 ` Naga Toro
2008-01-13 16:31 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 17:37 ` Naga Toro
2008-01-14 5:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 11:43 ` Galevsky
2008-01-14 11:19 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 16:45 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13 22:39 ` Dale
2008-01-14 6:54 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
2008-01-14 7:28 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 7:41 ` Dale
2008-01-14 7:51 ` Naga
2008-01-14 8:10 ` Dale
2008-01-14 16:18 ` James
2008-01-14 11:16 ` [gentoo-user] " Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-19 15:37 ` [gentoo-user] Quo vadis Gentoo [WAS: Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-19 19:55 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-16 4:58 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? »Q«
2008-01-13 14:48 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-12 20:03 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-12 21:16 ` [gentoo-user] " Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13 9:10 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 17:11 ` Δημήτριος Ροπόκης
2008-01-19 12:45 ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-20 0:40 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
2008-01-23 17:35 ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-23 18:48 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-12 22:06 ` James
2008-01-13 0:03 ` Dale
2008-01-13 4:08 ` James
2008-01-13 7:56 ` Mark Kirkwood
2008-01-13 9:31 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 2:52 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-13 9:58 ` Uwe Thiem
2008-01-13 9:29 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 19:19 ` [gentoo-user] " fire-eyes
2008-01-13 9:37 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-13 10:05 ` Alan E. Davis
2008-01-14 8:47 ` [gentoo-user] " Thufir
2008-01-13 10:06 ` [gentoo-user] " Uwe Thiem
2008-01-13 10:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-13 1:12 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2008-01-13 10:41 ` Mick
2008-01-13 14:51 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 1:19 ` James
2008-01-14 5:35 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 6:04 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-14 12:31 ` Mick
2008-01-14 10:26 ` Thufir
2008-01-14 16:51 ` James
2008-01-14 18:11 ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-14 18:30 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-14 19:47 ` James
2008-01-14 20:40 ` reader
2008-01-14 21:13 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-14 21:03 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15 5:22 ` reader
2008-01-15 5:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15 7:26 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-15 7:57 ` Mick
2008-01-14 21:51 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-15 0:31 ` Iain Buchanan [this message]
2008-01-14 19:15 ` James
2008-01-14 20:43 ` [gentoo-user] Re: License issues [was:Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-14 21:33 ` James
2008-01-14 22:16 ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-15 11:39 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-14 21:16 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15 1:36 ` James
2008-01-15 11:34 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-15 11:31 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-17 6:37 ` Thufir
2008-01-19 14:55 ` [gentoo-user] Quo vadis Gentoo [WAS: Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-14 10:30 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Thufir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1200357115.12251.20.camel@orpheus \
--to=iaindb@netspace.net.au \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox