From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD1F11395E2 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22C2AE0BC9; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A32E0B25 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id a197so236140213wmd.0 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 04:49:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7rEsGZa3ajNtIBhEXScBgdn5aAeayQQlz7xQ6OV6GpI=; b=KuFEz7wFQ958+3rRi0GWCjo1lH2hLfikEVVUvPfyZhoK5zZ3F80mwHSoirf9mIFeea HTsNa1ET4I8VTm2ywSsvBSa2yh7hE3jMJr/uVTRWQlp5iV4QOxbogJT3WwOrIb7TGu+I 2igGd1vjdnIQcj/hTYxVg6cauq6bkCNf6X3WMrAuRe6MpGL3/aEmz5riegsfc5na8/cK e+/CWLEMFH0fy7YQwLrHBfqk9tbj7R44aU35QqZwlL1qkJKNyev15fjw1xolNmzHiQGj L5bRSNfP+qJPR7dbwq5orbI3ORYRCqUqrIXSO17flvCvLg/bt5arq2vLOf+RVjZ9Scqs QnCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7rEsGZa3ajNtIBhEXScBgdn5aAeayQQlz7xQ6OV6GpI=; b=MnnaFuNTZDoOwcovw9dyv5Sk3udTAte3sGFyTKyO2al+rOeetZA6esfdHlYH63a/qd +bLuIpLxkJg4B0ALdN9tBFdREh7zwakuK6r7270o7iPrvcaXfPvtC18mMu4r5Ob1sBlq UWP6Aj8K4X4n/NkWwxXRwHvC84ZwcwAv4YZQ6X7Znp86GOqpiQigNR2iOIWNxG47hnaB SIpq97J+gVLCUe2ZQ3MqXyFvpyy65MCh6zIc3yv+36C4xwA5acx0ePOgKvYVxzFGxKVC Cxcc42zKduY1kT7+FkSkk4t/+oOa16iGqGysn2SwFo8MrUx5p6f5hxG+CUGHZBfy4vDc EE6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00ywcuOE3jpxjOrFArJU4tO4Ku1Jb143VCJDnwSkKNc7XI21/KuOu+OuuYJzicXog== X-Received: by 10.28.5.193 with SMTP id 184mr21783851wmf.89.1480423797010; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 04:49:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.20.0.40] ([196.212.62.210]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm51404090wjy.40.2016.11.29.04.49.55 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 04:49:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USE flag question (not total newbie) To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20161129012827.14326.2F5C2D91@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <46F51B34-DE12-43DC-BFEF-50E19885EC6B@antarean.org> <20161129045413.14401.353B15DE@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <11661662.SBB68D1yao@peak> From: Alan McKinnon Message-ID: <11dc6905-91b8-55b8-532f-2b0631efcff3@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:48:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <11661662.SBB68D1yao@peak> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 00f25dc6-ddab-416f-a6f4-b87a5744c5bc X-Archives-Hash: b7e7d58146be577ef0008695296c9db0 On 29/11/2016 14:26, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Monday 28 Nov 2016 20:59:30 Ian Zimmerman wrote: > >> I'll consider switching to qt5 when I can rebuild _all_ my packages that >> way. Under no circumstances will I install both qt4 and qt5, that is a >> recipe for madness. > > I take it you don't run a KDE desktop with KMail-2. I do, and I found many > months ago that it was no longer possible to resist Qt-5. Since then I've been > running a sort of hybrid system in which, as Neil said, most components of KDE > have been moved to Qt-5 but KMail-2 is still months away. > > Madness, while I wouldn't attempt to deny all possibility of it, seems not to > be evident here just yet. > I too don't see much wrong with co-installing Qt4 and Qt5. Different libs, different paths. Only real downside is disk space consumed. It's not really much different from having both gth-2 and gtk-3, or even gtk and qt -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com