From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A72E158086 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 851DAE085A; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01a.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01a.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22786E0839 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet) by smarthost01a.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mgSlg-0003aj-Cr for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:22:04 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using www-apps/jekyll? Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:22:03 +0100 Message-ID: <11857129.O9o76ZdvQC@wstn> In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01a-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: f21444e1-8a6e-4e47-81be-0a04112f19be X-Archives-Hash: 489821e5ca5a48cab4db53a56e6fddd1 On Thursday, 28 October 2021 21:54:50 BST Jack wrote: > I just noticed something which may or may not help. The jekyllrb.com > docs page, under Prerequisites, says Ruby version 2.5.0 or higher. Why > does the ebuild insist on 2.5 (no longer even in the tree) or 2.6. If > I were going to install it, the first thing I'd probably do is make a > copy in my local overlay, and allow a newer version of ruby. I don't > think that is likely to help with your problem of not finding one thing > or another, but who knows? (A note lower down on that page says that > using ruby 3.0.0 or higher add a requirement for webrick, but that is > available in portage, and could be handled in the ebuild. It's worth a try. I'll wait until after my weekly full backup at the weekend, though, then I'll give it a go. I have webrick installed already, using a Ruby Gem to do that (I think). Thanks for the idea. -- Regards, Peter.