From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ECF91382C5 for ; Sat, 15 May 2021 08:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE82DE0863; Sat, 15 May 2021 08:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 453DDE083B for ; Sat, 15 May 2021 08:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost03b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1lhpiG-00046R-CX for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 May 2021 08:31:56 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-user] boot hangs forever at =?UTF-8?B?4oCcTG9hZGluZyBpbml0aWFsIHJhbWRpc2suLi7igJ0=?= Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 09:31:55 +0100 Message-ID: <11771910.O9o76ZdvQC@peak> In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="nextPart5483183.DvuYhMxLoT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Originating-smarthost03b-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: bdc6a602-22cd-4bb0-b291-907d57e4ac38 X-Archives-Hash: 9b6f3f18f4661cf70894fae87e26537f This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --nextPart5483183.DvuYhMxLoT Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Saturday, 15 May 2021 00:54:02 BST John Blinka wrote: > I don=E2=80=99t think it=E2=80=99s a kernel compile issue. I just now us= ed=20 efibootmgr to > create a uefi entry with kernel command line parameters to=20 define the root > fs and initrd. That worked. That result focuses the blame on=20 grub. I'm glad that worked. Personally, I'm pleased to have ditched grub=20 altogether. =2D-=20 Regards, Peter Humphrey. --nextPart5483183.DvuYhMxLoT Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

On Saturday, 15 May 2021 00:54:02 BST John Blinka wrote:


> I don=E2=80=99t think it=E2=80=99s a kernel compile issue.  I = just now used efibootmgr to

>= ; create a uefi entry with kernel command line parameters to define the roo= t

>= ; fs and initrd.  That worked.  That result focuses the blame on = grub.


I'm glad that worked. Personally, I'm pleased to have ditched grub altog= ether.


--

Reg= ards,

Pet= er Humphrey.


--nextPart5483183.DvuYhMxLoT--