From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H95FR-000040-5h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:54:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0MJrQLX032467; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:53:26 GMT Received: from uni13mr.unity.ncsu.edu (uni13mr.unity.ncsu.edu [152.1.224.171]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0MJn5L2027601 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:49:05 GMT Received: from mho (mho.ece.ncsu.edu [152.14.96.9]) by uni13mr.unity.ncsu.edu (8.13.7/8.13.8/Nv5.2006.1109) with ESMTP id l0MJn3Nr020370 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:49:03 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] GCC Failing From: Randy Barlow To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <200701221325.41785.nagatoro@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:49:02 -0500 Message-Id: <1169495343.28295.13.camel@mho> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-27.rhel4.6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.0.289146, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.22.113932 X-Spam-Status: No, Hits=7% X-Spam-Level: IIIIIII X-Archives-Salt: 35486677-5ebc-4b7e-95bd-0519c46a1242 X-Archives-Hash: 93e6b785c14d3585f628c92392554881 On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 19:33 +0200, Vlad Dogaru wrote: > (presumably good -- only let > memtest run for about 3 minutes) You should probably test it much longer than 3 minutes before you can be confident that the 256 MB chip doesn't have issues... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list