From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-58234-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1H4yaU-000564-1X
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:59:18 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0BBw3v6018675;
	Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:58:03 GMT
Received: from mail.netspace.net.au (mail-out4.netspace.net.au [203.10.110.77])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0BBrpZs017310
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:53:52 GMT
Received: from [172.16.0.52] (dsl-203-113-237-125.SA.netspace.net.au [203.113.237.125])
	by mail.netspace.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DAA375879
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:53:50 +1100 (EST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Top/Bottom Posting
From: Iain Buchanan <iaindb@netspace.net.au>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <45A4ECC2.3040009@buanzo.com.ar>
References: 
	 <3D60AF2712C16D42A38076E52FD6E3D23F0C7D@ukmcrdembx01.rd.astrazeneca.net>
	 <200701100928.00737.ext-dirk.heinrichs@nokia.com>
	 <8cd1ed20701100042j6f5d8604v956205c0328a299e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200701100953.47306.ext-dirk.heinrichs@nokia.com>
	 <8cd1ed20701100533ref2719dw6b4b649d8953293@mail.gmail.com>
	 <45A4ECC2.3040009@buanzo.com.ar>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:23:20 +0930
Message-Id: <1168516400.11066.2.camel@orpheus>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 5e0e0487-846b-42c4-9f0f-7b0a521e3070
X-Archives-Hash: 6cd82ca02aac6ceaaec76860c2f77f88

On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 10:40 -0300, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Kent Fredric wrote:
> > I'll put it here to keep you happy, but IMO, if the body of the
> > message discusses a singular idea, then replying after the signature
> > should be somewhat imo acceptable.
> 
> Many mail readers (e.g Thunderbird) put the signature (that means, the
> text after a \r\n--\r\n
> token) in a different, lighter color.

actually, I think that's supposed to be dash-dash-space-newline.

>  Thus, replying below the signature may put your reply in the
> same color, potentially rendering it invisible to some eyes.

evolution automatically deletes everything including and below the
dash-dash-space-newline when you reply.

cya,
-- 
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>

  We must believe in free will. We have no choice. -Isaac B. Singer

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list