From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 179D71382C5 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A862EE091D; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw1.antarean.org (gw1.antarean.org [194.145.200.214]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B760E08A0 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw1.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Cw7jy2wF2z10jk for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:33:10 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from gw1.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gw1.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id on0sOcbj-lhl for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:33:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailstore1.adm.antarean.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw1.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Cw7jy0wpvzyVJ for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:33:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailstore1.adm.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Cw85k6SKzz15 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:50:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from mailstore1.adm.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailstore1.adm.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ncx_KOvWKcz for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:50:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from iris.localnet (iris.adm.antarean.org [10.55.16.47]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailstore1.adm.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Cw85k5BFZz13 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:50:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=antarean.org; s=default; t=1608015018; bh=41nQ9FA3ro5AvhejJibih0eBAVfNOZzPoxN6Ky32GrM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=HYn82NXPomubIku+cgQjlWJ7x9i/tCF5Od4hEoMsOX/MwR0AN2tak9fJ12a48wdj0 d72nBYcwNWs0Sb3e/Q0ZGS046IoAZGlH2ZPq52nTPMP2+gMfHTPQT7GjFyki6I/XUb dikm+nJECyPpmRVAfVYSVSTaH2tfTNWyGXXmhYuw= From: "J. Roeleveld" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:50:18 +0100 Message-ID: <11675602.O9o76ZdvQC@iris> In-Reply-To: <352e111f-c0b9-5213-3ade-ce89c44c967f@sys-concept.com> References: <6eac706b-9c8c-e510-5e2b-7ae2dce86434@sys-concept.com> <352e111f-c0b9-5213-3ade-ce89c44c967f@sys-concept.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: 6fe3e8fe-38bd-4755-b0d6-fc119f2799a2 X-Archives-Hash: 2d4081a17ea04711ce239ca20795ad9d On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 7:17:57 AM CET thelma@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 12/14/2020 06:21 PM, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote: > > By mistake on new installation I untar wrong: stage-3 x86_64 instead of > > i686 > > > > during kernel compiling I got: > > cc1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set > > > > Is it possible to untar new stage-3 (i686) over current one, or I need > > to delete all the folders? > > After selecting stage-3 (i686) I still get the same error message when > trying to compile kernel: > > CC scripts/mod/empty.o > cc1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:266: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1 > make: *** [Makefile:1137: prepare0] Error 2 > > The CPU I have: > AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor Isn't this a 64-bit CPU? If you boot using a 64bit live-image (the gentoo-admin ISO as an example), you should be able to actually use 64bit. -- Joost