From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GwRu0-0007iM-QX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:28:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kBINN4Ox032380; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:23:04 GMT Received: from mail.netspace.net.au (mail-out4.netspace.net.au [203.10.110.77]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBINFoVv017856 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:15:51 GMT Received: from [172.16.0.52] (ppp246-231.static.internode.on.net [203.122.246.231]) by mail.netspace.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1031376D04 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:15:52 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy? From: Iain Buchanan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10612181035v70eae88du96a3153bbeaadc49@mail.gmail.com> References: <200612182155.11490.mrugeshkarnik@gmail.com> <988916.93964.qm@web31815.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <59f9c5160612180917g64fd16fdu27ac460ec7a23fb7@mail.gmail.com> <200612181949.02474.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> <49bf44f10612181035v70eae88du96a3153bbeaadc49@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:45:45 +0930 Message-Id: <1166483745.10797.23.camel@orpheus> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 266e454d-0d02-4ba0-8fb4-c9a873d168d0 X-Archives-Hash: b035a808f7e139cf56bfa041ee6db801 On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:35 -0800, Grant wrote: > Gentoo literally can't die without something better to replace it. the only thing to replace Gentoo, will be a better Gentoo :) -- Iain Buchanan We must believe in free will. We have no choice. -Isaac B. Singer -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list