From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3749F1395E2 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 970B9E0BDC; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4744AE0B8A for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cBhUL-000DmK-90 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:26:21 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USE flag question (not total newbie) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:26:20 +0000 Message-ID: <11661662.SBB68D1yao@peak> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.8.11-gentoo; KDE/4.14.26; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20161129045413.14401.353B15DE@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20161129012827.14326.2F5C2D91@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <46F51B34-DE12-43DC-BFEF-50E19885EC6B@antarean.org> <20161129045413.14401.353B15DE@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: bf4cc004-774b-4090-9ffb-0671fceb3ce9 X-Archives-Hash: 3fa63bba9771ee2e6b37652fd20e3504 On Monday 28 Nov 2016 20:59:30 Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I'll consider switching to qt5 when I can rebuild _all_ my packages that > way. Under no circumstances will I install both qt4 and qt5, that is a > recipe for madness. I take it you don't run a KDE desktop with KMail-2. I do, and I found many months ago that it was no longer possible to resist Qt-5. Since then I've been running a sort of hybrid system in which, as Neil said, most components of KDE have been moved to Qt-5 but KMail-2 is still months away. Madness, while I wouldn't attempt to deny all possibility of it, seems not to be evident here just yet. -- Regards Peter