From: Michael <confabulate@kintzios.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with python3_12, but /var/db,cache with python3_13
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 19:08:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <116523174.nniJfEyVGO@rogueboard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3692658.R56niFO833@rogueboard>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7429 bytes --]
On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 00:04:01 British Summer Time Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 00:00:35 British Summer Time Eli Schwartz wrote:
> > On 5/19/25 6:27 PM, Michael wrote:
> > > No buildpkg on this system. :-(
> >
> > Gentoo provides a large (45 gb) public buildpkg cache at
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_Binary_Host_Quickstart
> >
> > >> I'm not sure how to
> > >> fix that. Basically, portage stores data on what is installed in /var
> > >> but the packages are in /, mostly /(s)bin and /usr. Basically, portage
> > >> thinks one thing but the truth is something else. I suspect emerge
> > >> isn't happy since it is so confused.
> > >
> > > Emerge is not happy when it tries to use package versions which the
> > > filesystem does not have installed yet. I'll try once more to tweak
> > > python targets in case I can get emerge to build a working toolchain.
> > > If
> > > that doesn't work I'll fetch a stage 3, build what I need as binaries
> > > and
> > > then emerge them on the live system before I carry on.
> >
> > With the public binhost you should be able to skip the stage3 and go
> > straight to emerging a binary toolchain. I'd suggest you should even use
> > --getbinpkg --emptytree @world for consistency.
>
> Thank you Eli, I'll take a look at this approach as it will be a quicker
> option.
I thought before I use binaries I better see how big the job ahead might be.
I've set:
*/* PYTHON_TARGETS: -* python3_12 python3_13
*/* PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET: -* python3_13
then tried to emerge python:
emerge -1aDv -e dev-lang/python
It wouldn't start because it complained packages (any/all) were masked by
keyword. This is a stable OS, so I do not understand why it thinks stable
versions are masked:
$ emerge --info | grep ACCEPT_KEYWORDS
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
Anyway, I tried it this way, which allowed all but 1 out 481 packages to
emerge successfully:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" emerge -1aDv -e dev-lang/python
Then this happens:
>>> Source configured.
>>> Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtwayland-5.15.16-r1/work/
qtwayland-everywhere-src-5.15.16 ...
* Running emake
make -j9 -l9.8
cd src/ && ( test -e Makefile || /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/qmake -o Makefile /var/
tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtwayland-5.15.16-r1/work/qtwayland-everywhere-src-5.15.16/
src/src.pro CONFIG+=release CONFIG-=debug 'QMAKE_AR=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ar
cqs' QMAKE_CC=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc QMAKE_LINK_C=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
QMAKE_LINK_C_SHLIB=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc QMAKE_CXX=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++
QMAKE_LINK=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ QMAKE_LINK_SHLIB=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++
QMAKE_OBJCOPY=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-objcopy QMAKE_RANLIB= QMAKE_STRIP=x86_64-pc-
linux-gnu-strip 'QMAKE_CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer'
QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE= QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEBUG= 'QMAKE_CXXFLAGS=-march=native -O2
-pipe -fomit-frame-pointer' QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE= QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_DEBUG=
'QMAKE_LFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,--
undefined-version' QMAKE_LFLAGS_RELEASE= QMAKE_LFLAGS_DEBUG= ) && make -f
Makefile
make[1]: Entering directory '/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtwayland-5.15.16-r1/
work/qtwayland-everywhere-src-5.15.16_build/src'
cd qtwaylandscanner/ && ( test -e Makefile || /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/qmake -o
Makefile /var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtwayland-5.15.16-r1/work/qtwayland-
everywhere-src-5.15.16/src/qtwaylandscanner/qtwaylandscanner.pro
CONFIG+=release CONFIG-=debug 'QMAKE_AR=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ar cqs'
QMAKE_CC=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc QMAKE_LINK_C=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
QMAKE_LINK_C_SHLIB=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc QMAKE_CXX=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++
QMAKE_LINK=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ QMAKE_LINK_SHLIB=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++
QMAKE_OBJCOPY=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-objcopy QMAKE_RANLIB= QMAKE_STRIP=x86_64-pc-
linux-gnu-strip 'QMAKE_CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer'
QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE= QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEBUG= 'QMAKE_CXXFLAGS=-march=native -O2
-pipe -fomit-frame-pointer' QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE= QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_DEBUG=
'QMAKE_LFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,--
undefined-version' QMAKE_LFLAGS_RELEASE= QMAKE_LFLAGS_DEBUG= ) && make -f
Makefile
make[2]: Entering directory '/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtwayland-5.15.16-r1/
work/qtwayland-everywhere-src-5.15.16_build/src/qtwaylandscanner'
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -c -march=native -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
-std=c++1z -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wextra -Wvla -Wdate-time -Wshift-overflow=2
-Wduplicated-cond -Wno-stringop-overflow -Wno-format-overflow -D_REENTRANT
-fPIC -DQT_NO_LINKED_LIST -DQT_NO_FOREACH -DQT_NO_JAVA_STYLE_ITERATORS
-DQT_NO_LINKED_LIST -DQT_NO_NARROWING_CONVERSIONS_IN_CONNECT
-DQT_USE_QSTRINGBUILDER -DQT_NO_EXCEPTIONS -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_CORE_LIB -I/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/
qtwayland-5.15.16-r1/work/qtwayland-everywhere-src-5.15.16/src/
qtwaylandscanner -I. -I/usr/include/qt5 -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore -I.moc -I/
usr/lib64/qt5/mkspecs/linux-g++ -o .obj/qtwaylandscanner.o /var/tmp/portage/
dev-qt/qtwayland-5.15.16-r1/work/qtwayland-everywhere-src-5.15.16/src/
qtwaylandscanner/qtwaylandscanner.cpp
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs
-Wl,--undefined-version -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -o ../../bin/qtwaylandscanner
.obj/qtwaylandscanner.o /usr/lib64/libQt5Core.so -pthread
make[2]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtwayland-5.15.16-r1/work/
qtwayland-everywhere-src-5.15.16_build/src/qtwaylandscanner'
cd client/ && ( test -e Makefile || /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/qmake -o Makefile /var/
tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtwayland-5.15.16-r1/work/qtwayland-everywhere-src-5.15.16/
src/client/client.pro CONFIG+=release CONFIG-=debug 'QMAKE_AR=x86_64-pc-linux-
gnu-ar cqs' QMAKE_CC=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc QMAKE_LINK_C=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-
gcc QMAKE_LINK_C_SHLIB=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc QMAKE_CXX=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-
g++ QMAKE_LINK=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ QMAKE_LINK_SHLIB=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g+
+ QMAKE_OBJCOPY=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-objcopy QMAKE_RANLIB= QMAKE_STRIP=x86_64-
pc-linux-gnu-strip 'QMAKE_CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer'
QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE= QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEBUG= 'QMAKE_CXXFLAGS=-march=native -O2
-pipe -fomit-frame-pointer' QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE= QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_DEBUG=
'QMAKE_LFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,--
undefined-version' QMAKE_LFLAGS_RELEASE= QMAKE_LFLAGS_DEBUG= ) && make -f
Makefile
Project ERROR: Library 'atspi' is not defined.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:75: sub-client-make_first] Error 3
make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtwayland-5.15.16-r1/work/
qtwayland-everywhere-src-5.15.16_build/src'
make: *** [Makefile:49: sub-src-make_first] Error 2
* ERROR: dev-qt/qtwayland-5.15.16-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase):
* emake failed
OK, I thought I better install what it seems to be complaining about, because
it was not installed in this system:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" emerge -1av dev-python/pyatspi
However, it still complains:
# python -c 'import atspi'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
import atspi
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'atspi'
Apparently, it is a media-libs/assimp QT bug:
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-84037
I've re-emerged media-libs/assimp, but the bug remains ... I wonder how it had
been installed originally. Is there anything I can do about this?
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-19 9:30 [gentoo-user] Filesystem with python3_12, but /var/db,cache with python3_13 Michael
2025-05-19 13:17 ` Dale
2025-05-19 22:27 ` Michael
2025-05-19 23:00 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-05-19 23:04 ` Michael
2025-05-20 18:08 ` Michael [this message]
2025-05-20 18:42 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=116523174.nniJfEyVGO@rogueboard \
--to=confabulate@kintzios.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox