From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GmGrl-0006qb-HH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:39:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAKLbc5k025212; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:37:38 GMT Received: from bullet.espersunited.com (adsl-70-234-122-249.dsl.tul2ok.sbcglobal.net [70.234.122.249]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAKLZI0H003788 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:35:21 GMT Received: from camille.espersunited.com (camille.espersunited.com [70.234.122.250]) by bullet.espersunited.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kAKLZGYX024336 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:35:16 -0600 Subject: Re: [OT] Progress bar for cp? (was:[gentoo-user] PATH error?) From: Michael Sullivan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <7573e9640611201210q8d5cf4fge832cade024c09e@mail.gmail.com> References: <200611192041.42498.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <200611191516.00772.bss03@volumehost.net> <45620250.2070605@tarpman.homelinux.com> <200611201954.00377.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <7573e9640611201210q8d5cf4fge832cade024c09e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:35:15 -0600 Message-Id: <1164058516.12764.0.camel@camille.espersunited.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4e1dd624-37ec-4044-b702-33d90cfbd565 X-Archives-Hash: 33b4110ac4db689e1b79ecca4b6c67e7 On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 13:10 -0700, Richard Fish wrote: > On 11/20/06, Mick wrote: > > I was trying to remember what -g stood for and just confirmed my suspicion why > > a progress bar is no longer being displayed. What's the current equivalent > > (why was -g taken out)? > > There is no equivalent...the progress bar was a gentoo-specific patch > that was rejected by upstream, so it got dropped. > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146964 > > -Richard Where can we get this patch? I looked at the bug report, but I couldn't find a link for the patch... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list