From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-54723-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1Gk1sm-0007A7-AU
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:15:37 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAEHDPeF009640;
	Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:13:25 GMT
Received: from feux02a-isp.its.it (smtp5.atlavia.it [213.199.4.198])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAEHB8JE010250
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:11:08 GMT
Received: from mail.auroracomputers.it ([62.123.180.57])
	by feux02a-isp.its.it (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAEI6gwk000376
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:06:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.auroracomputers.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477BD29C042
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:10:23 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]  Re: Re: PAM issues
From: Lorenzo Marussi <lorenzo@auroracomputers.it>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To:  <6696042.Tcyus3tGHI@m-id.message-center.info>
References:  <45587D49.2050806@mid.message-center.info>
	 <200611141456.29386.alan@linuxholdings.co.za>
	 <2510744.7i4yU6GkOA@work.message-center.info>
	 <200611141536.46680.alan@linuxholdings.co.za>
	 <6696042.Tcyus3tGHI@m-id.message-center.info>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-g05SDNvdJkxe+Gzw828F"
Organization: Aurora Computers S.r.l.
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:11:01 +0100
Message-Id: <1163524261.7491.5.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 
X-Archives-Salt: 31ecf5fc-d3d4-40cb-8119-070605e2cd7d
X-Archives-Hash: 32d90d6040d4227c16c1b85e1373fff1


--=-g05SDNvdJkxe+Gzw828F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id kAEHDPeh009640

but, with pam-0.99.6.3-r1, have you tried to make a "revdep-rebuild -p
-i" ?

Lorenzo Marussi


Il giorno mar, 14/11/2006 alle 17.40 +0100, Alexander Skwar ha scritto:

> =B7 Alan McKinnon <alan@linuxholdings.co.za>:
>=20
> > On Tuesday 14 November 2006 15:23, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> > Any clues from revdep-rebuild?
> >> > I take it you did log out and in again,
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >> Reboot: No.
> >=20
> > That's worth a try. I know it goes against the grain but at this stag=
e=20
> > what do you have to lose?
>=20
> Rebooting is hard. That's a server, after all. And right now, I downgra=
ded
> to Pam 78.
>=20
> > At least you are guaranteed that every unlink =20
> > really is unlinked.=20
>=20
> Hm. But why should this do something? I mean, I re-compiled
> PAM and sudo now several times.=20
>=20
> Alexander Skwar
> --=20
> Only someone with nothing to be sorry for smiles back at the rear of an
> elephant.
>=20
>=20

--=-g05SDNvdJkxe+Gzw828F
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
  <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.12.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
but, with <TT>pam-0.99.6.3-r1, have you tried to make a &quot;revdep-rebuild -p -i&quot; ?</TT><BR>
<BR>
Lorenzo Marussi<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Il giorno mar, 14/11/2006 alle 17.40 +0100, Alexander Skwar ha scritto:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&#183; Alan McKinnon &lt;<A HREF="mailto:alan@linuxholdings.co.za">alan@linuxholdings.co.za</A>&gt;:</FONT>

<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt; On Tuesday 14 November 2006 15:23, Alexander Skwar wrote:</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt;&gt; &gt; Any clues from revdep-rebuild?</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt;&gt; &gt; I take it you did log out and in again,</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt;&gt;</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt;&gt; Yes.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt;&gt;</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt;&gt; Reboot: No.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt; </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt; That's worth a try. I know it goes against the grain but at this stage </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt; what do you have to lose?</FONT>

<FONT COLOR="#000000">Rebooting is hard. That's a server, after all. And right now, I downgraded</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">to Pam 78.</FONT>

<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt; At least you are guaranteed that every unlink  </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&gt; really is unlinked. </FONT>

<FONT COLOR="#000000">Hm. But why should this do something? I mean, I re-compiled</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">PAM and sudo now several times. </FONT>

<FONT COLOR="#000000">Alexander Skwar</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">-- </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Only someone with nothing to be sorry for smiles back at the rear of an</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">elephant.</FONT>


</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>

--=-g05SDNvdJkxe+Gzw828F--

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list