From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GIrON-0003Bp-2V for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:35:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7VIXj72001353; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:33:45 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7VIVd4w016158 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:31:39 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2006 18:31:39 -0000 Received: from i5387A1BD.versanet.de (EHLO halde.meinedomain.de) [83.135.161.189] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2006 20:31:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #27338136 Subject: what about glibc upgrade (was: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc 4.1 with gentoo 2006.1) From: tdrueke To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <44F720F4.3010906@veldy.net> References: <44F60C0C.3050402@xunil.at> <20060831152019.GA4801@sympatico.ca> <44F70B74.20808@vista-express.com> <44F720F4.3010906@veldy.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:31:40 +0200 Message-Id: <1157049100.13259.11.camel@halde.meinedomain.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 33c0c67b-026c-4f23-a07d-38003709351e X-Archives-Hash: fd8c7470658931555a4f8206088f44ac Sorry for capturing the thread. :) What about the glibc upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4. Does the same concerning "emerge -e world" apply here (e.g. it is recommended to do it) ? Or is it a more relaxed situation and simply emerging glibc 2.4 is enough ? BR Thomas On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 12:48 -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Dale wrote: > > Since this is a major upgrade you may want to reconsider. So I guess it > > depends on how much risk you want to take with it. If anything, at > > least do a emerge -e system. That should get you booted even if the GUI > > fails for some reason. > > > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > > > > As has always been the case, C++ applications are probably the most > likely to be affected by ABI changes. So, if you run KDE or Qt apps, > then it is probably a very good idea to rebuild world. > > Tom > > -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list