* Re: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /etc/conf.d/net
@ 2006-08-21 14:13 brettholcomb
2006-08-22 9:07 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: brettholcomb @ 2006-08-21 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Don't feel bad Alan - for me, also this is very unclear. I upgraded baselayout then got the message my conf.d/net was using deprecated syntax so I went to net.example, copied it to net which is symlinked to net.eth0 (after backing up<G>). I then went through the file and found that it appears iproute2 is now preferred although there are no man pages or docs and it got installed on my system. I use static so I updated the address with the new function per the in-file instructions and set the route. I restarted net.eth0 and immediately lost internet access - I had pop and https but no news or regular http or sync! After much hassle all I did was comment out some nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf and left a couple more and it worked again. To be honest I can't say the upgrade was to blame - I'm checking into the nameservers having issues.
However, the differences between the old and new or what the new is supposed to do better is very unclear.
>
> From: Alan Mckinnon <alan@linuxholdings.co.za>
> Date: 2006/08/21 Mon AM 09:43:17 EDT
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /etc/conf.d/net
>
> On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 10:05 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > · Alan Mckinnon <alan@linuxholdings.co.za>:
>
> I read it, but it doesn't deny anything - it simply doesn't mention
> iface_* at all. Maybe iface_* is deprecated, but I've used it since
> 2005.0 and that's what the docs said then. I haven't seen any updates
> about it either. The baselayout ebuild has several checks at the end for
> old deprecated files and veriables, but iface_* isn't one of them.
>
> I'm using baselayout-1.12.4-r6
>
> alan
>
>
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /etc/conf.d/net
2006-08-21 14:13 Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /etc/conf.d/net brettholcomb
@ 2006-08-22 9:07 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2006-08-22 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 10:13 -0400, brettholcomb@bellsouth.net wrote:
> Don't feel bad Alan - for me, also this is very unclear. I upgraded baselayout
> then got the message my conf.d/net was using deprecated syntax so I went to
> net.example, copied it to net which is symlinked to net.eth0 (after backing up<G>).
> I then went through the file and found that it appears iproute2 is now
> preferred although there are no man pages or docs and it got installed
> on my system.
I came to the same conclusions, which means that I now have to get to
grips with using iproute2 after many years of using ifconfig/route. All
this is probably documented somewhere, so I plan to find it's hiding
place on the wiki then post a link here :-)
Several people have had /etc/conf.d/net issues lately so maybe it's time
we resolved these questions fully
alan
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-22 7:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-21 14:13 Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /etc/conf.d/net brettholcomb
2006-08-22 9:07 ` Alan McKinnon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox