From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GE1av-0006AA-Ng for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:28:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7IAQmom019069; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:26:48 GMT Received: from cranium.sybase.co.za (sqlprd.sybase.co.za [192.96.139.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7IAOdim024637 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:24:41 GMT Received: from localhost (cranium.sybase.co.za [127.0.0.1]) by cranium.sybase.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AEF83457 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:26:04 +0200 (SAST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sybase.co.za Received: from cranium.sybase.co.za ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cranium.sybase.co.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ImyKgeUskMVo for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:25:58 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [192.168.2.140] (unknown [192.168.2.140]) by cranium.sybase.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BD683455 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:25:56 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Stefans posts on gentoo-user (was: Re: looking for a terminal w/ url activation capability) From: Alan Mckinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20060818095506.GA17391@xs4all.nl> References: <20060817154058.GA7891@nibiru.local> <200608172200.54702.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> <44E5535F.8020905@mid.email-server.info> <20060818095506.GA17391@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:24:31 +0200 Message-Id: <1155896672.509.3.camel@gentoo> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ca446871-91d0-40a7-a751-ffe953b092eb X-Archives-Hash: c9bff37ebbb5075c2e82510faad83a2a On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 11:55 +0200, Stefan Wimmer wrote: > > But somehow, I don't think that (only) gmane is "guilty". There > > HAVE to be more people out there, who use slrn and gmane. Maybe > > not on the Gentoo list, but there are so many lists, that you > > cannot be the only one. > > Ok - I'm using mutt now and hopefully can avoid the annoying headers > in > the body ... FWIW this one came through fine for me and got properly filtered. I too got all the earlier mails (using slrn) going into my inbox alan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list