* [gentoo-user] update xorg && kde-meta @ 2006-08-14 14:52 James 2006-08-14 16:06 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: James @ 2006-08-14 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Hello, Some time ago, I upgraded several systems I manage. First was the (painful) upgrade of kde-monolith to kde-meta. [1] Then the easier of the two xorg 6.8 to xorg 7.0. [2] I have kept these pacakges masked for a while on other systems, some of which I only get possession of sporadically for critical/huge upgrade. So my questions are: 1. Are these still the most updated urls? 2. Which should be performed first kde monolithic-->meta or Xorg to Xorg-modular? 3. Is there any method to streamline/automate these tasks so that the machines compile the new software overnight, unattended? (note distcc is not used, since these are 'traveling portables' that are often sync'd and updated away from our main office. thoughts and recomendations are most welcome. [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/kde-split-ebuilds.xml [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/modular-x-howto.xml James -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] update xorg && kde-meta 2006-08-14 14:52 [gentoo-user] update xorg && kde-meta James @ 2006-08-14 16:06 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen 2006-08-14 16:08 ` Alan McKinnon 2006-08-14 16:55 ` Richard Fish 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Bo Ørsted Andresen @ 2006-08-14 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1866 bytes --] On Monday 14 August 2006 16:52, James wrote: > Some time ago, I upgraded several systems I manage. > First was the (painful) upgrade of kde-monolith > to kde-meta. [1] > > Then the easier of the two xorg 6.8 to xorg 7.0. [2] > > I have kept these pacakges masked for a while on other systems, > some of which I only get possession of sporadically for critical/huge > upgrade. > > So my questions are: > > 1. Are these still the most updated urls? I believe so. > 2. Which should be performed first kde monolithic-->meta > or Xorg to Xorg-modular? Definitely the Xorg monolithic to modular upgrade. KDE is based on X.org. Not the other way around... Further X.org was contrary to KDE made modular by upstream. This means that monolithic X.org is no longer supported. Monolithic KDE is still supported and hence you don't really have to make that change. > 3. Is there any method to streamline/automate these tasks > so that the machines compile the new software overnight, unattended? [...] > thoughts and recomendations are most welcome. First you need to decide if you want all of X.org (virtual/x11) or a more minimal install (xorg-base/x11-xorg). Likewise you need to decide if you want all of KDE (kde-base/kde-meta) or only selected apps or something in the middle. Also if these computers aren't too different (i.e. the CFLAGS are alike - same arch) from each other it might be worth the effort to make use flags the same and create a binhost. That way after compiling it on one computer with FEATURES="buildpkg" you wouldn't have to compile them again for any of the remaining computers. Just make the binary packages available via e.g. ftp and set the PORTAGE_BINHOST variable on the computers while you have them. Then you can use emerge --getbinpkg to emerge the packages... -- Bo Andresen [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] update xorg && kde-meta 2006-08-14 14:52 [gentoo-user] update xorg && kde-meta James 2006-08-14 16:06 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen @ 2006-08-14 16:08 ` Alan McKinnon 2006-08-14 16:55 ` Richard Fish 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Alan McKinnon @ 2006-08-14 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 14:52 +0000, James wrote: > Hello, > > Some time ago, I upgraded several systems I manage. > First was the (painful) upgrade of kde-monolith > to kde-meta. [1] > > Then the easier of the two xorg 6.8 to xorg 7.0. [2] > > I have kept these pacakges masked for a while on other systems, > some of which I only get possession of sporadically for critical/huge > upgrade. > > > So my questions are: > > 1. Are these still the most updated urls? AFAIK, yes. I also did both of these upgrades recently on a Dell notebook (as well as the dreaded gcc 3.3 -> 3.4), and all three went off without a hitch using those very howtos > > 2. Which should be performed first kde monolithic-->meta > or Xorg to Xorg-modular? Doesn't matter, they are independant. FWIW, I found the Xorg upgrade to be far easier - unmerge 6.8, adjust USE, merge 7.0. I had some minor tweaking to do with xorg.conf and ati-drivers, but nothing out of the ordinary for a gentoo user :-) The KDE upgrade was much more painful, mostly because I couldn't just unmerge one package and merge another - I hadn't installed package "kde" way back when, instead I had used kde-base, kde-network etc (about 7 in total). Figuring out which -meta packages and which regular builds to use took some time. The merges themselves went smoothly. The worst was gcc though. I like to tinker with my box, so I took the safe route with "emerge -e system ; emerge -e world" to be sure everything would be rebuilt. It took 36 hours, eventually I had to run it from a tty, niced to 10, so I could use the machine in the meantime > 3. Is there any method to streamline/automate these tasks > so that the machines compile the new software overnight, unattended? Xorg is relatively quick to build, I think mine was an hour once the emerge got going. KDE took several hours. But in both cases it was a few minutes to do the unmerge, so I didn't see the need to automate it. I would advise however that you quickpkg all relevant packages on the machines, just in case, so that you can put them back if the unexpected happens alan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] update xorg && kde-meta 2006-08-14 14:52 [gentoo-user] update xorg && kde-meta James 2006-08-14 16:06 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen 2006-08-14 16:08 ` Alan McKinnon @ 2006-08-14 16:55 ` Richard Fish 2006-08-14 18:40 ` [gentoo-user] " James 2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Richard Fish @ 2006-08-14 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 8/14/06, James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > 2. Which should be performed first kde monolithic-->meta > or Xorg to Xorg-modular? I don't think it actually matters. > 3. Is there any method to streamline/automate these tasks > so that the machines compile the new software overnight, unattended? Well, I would use a system that has a lot of disk space, and make a chroot build environment for those laptops. With FEATURES=buildpkg, you can then use a system you have full access to to build binary packages for the upgrade, and then when you have access, you can update quickly with --usepkgonly. The AMD 32-bit chroot guide [1] is useful here, even for non x86_64 systems: -Richard [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=2 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: update xorg && kde-meta 2006-08-14 16:55 ` Richard Fish @ 2006-08-14 18:40 ` James 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: James @ 2006-08-14 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Richard Fish <bigfish <at> asmallpond.org> writes: > Well, I would use a system that has a lot of disk space, and make a > chroot build environment for those laptops. With FEATURES=buildpkg, > you can then use a system you have full access to to build binary > packages for the upgrade, and then when you have access, you can > update quickly with --usepkgonly. > The AMD 32-bit chroot guide [1] is useful here, even for non x86_64 systems: > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=2 thanks to Bo, Alan, and Richard for the advice. I think this is going to put off until the weekend so I can do several systems all at once, and have a few days to deal with issues.... thx, James -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-14 18:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-08-14 14:52 [gentoo-user] update xorg && kde-meta James 2006-08-14 16:06 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen 2006-08-14 16:08 ` Alan McKinnon 2006-08-14 16:55 ` Richard Fish 2006-08-14 18:40 ` [gentoo-user] " James
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox