From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17ED4138350 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05251E0ABA; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03c.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03c.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D230E0AAC for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost03c.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jQxvs-0000cw-SG for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:47:44 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:47:44 +0100 Message-ID: <11506562.O9o76ZdvQC@peak> In-Reply-To: <20200421165803.GB187193@redacted> References: <20200421165803.GB187193@redacted> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost03c-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 4c6dbd85-7cd8-467b-9cba-06ba83ff0a57 X-Archives-Hash: 6c49d09071fb47a86cad1b9455bade93 On Tuesday, 21 April 2020 17:58:03 BST Consus wrote: > ... and even distribution kernel is not an official thing, but a desperate > attempt of someone to fix things. Eh? Desperate? -- Regards, Peter.